Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Aug 5:7:341.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00341. eCollection 2016.

Engineered Biopolymeric Scaffolds for Chronic Wound Healing

Laura E Dickinson  1 , Sharon Gerecht  2
Affiliations
Review

Engineered Biopolymeric Scaffolds for Chronic Wound Healing

Laura E Dickinson et al. Front Physiol. .

Abstract

Skin regeneration requires the coordinated integration of concomitant biological and molecular events in the extracellular wound environment during overlapping phases of inflammation, proliferation, and matrix remodeling. This process is highly efficient during normal wound healing. However, chronic wounds fail to progress through the ordered and reparative wound healing process and are unable to heal, requiring long-term treatment at high costs. There are many advanced skin substitutes, which mostly comprise bioactive dressings containing mammalian derived matrix components, and/or human cells, in clinical use. However, it is presently hypothesized that no treatment significantly outperforms the others. To address this unmet challenge, recent research has focused on developing innovative acellular biopolymeric scaffolds as more efficacious wound healing therapies. These biomaterial-based skin substitutes are precisely engineered and fine-tuned to recapitulate aspects of the wound healing milieu and target specific events in the wound healing cascade to facilitate complete skin repair with restored function and tissue integrity. This mini-review will provide a brief overview of chronic wound healing and current skin substitute treatment strategies while focusing on recent engineering approaches that regenerate skin using synthetic, biopolymeric scaffolds. We discuss key polymeric scaffold design criteria, including degradation, biocompatibility, and microstructure, and how they translate to inductive microenvironments that stimulate cell infiltration and vascularization to enhance chronic wound healing. As healthcare moves toward precision medicine-based strategies, the potential and therapeutic implications of synthetic, biopolymeric scaffolds as tunable treatment modalities for chronic wounds will be considered.

Keywords: acellular matrices; biopolymeric scaffolds; chronic wounds; inflammatory; matrix remodeling; skin regeneration; skin substitutes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Biopolymeric dextran scaffold facilitates wound healing in murine and porcine burn models. (A) Complete healing was observed in mice by day 21. Dextran treated wounds exhibited mature epithelial structures, including hair follicles (F) and sebaceous glands in the dermal layer as indicated by Masson trichrome staining (left panel; scale bar = 100 μm). By day 35, new hair growth was observed in the center of dextran treated wounds, as shown by photos, compared to wounds treated with dressing only; arrows indicate center of wound. (B) Wound closure was observed by day 14 in a porcine model as shown by representative macroscopic and immunohistological images. Identification of neoepithelium using Masson's trichrome-stained sections (right panel) confirmed that wounds treated with dressing-only had an epithelial gap, whereas dextran-treated wounds were completely re-epithelialized with a thick reticulated epithelium. Scale bar = 1 cm. Modified from Sun et al. (2011b), and modified and reprinted from Shen et al. (2015). Copyright (2015), with permission from Elsevier.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Augst A., Kong H., Mooney D. (2006). Alginate hydrogels as biomaterials. Macromol. Biosci. 6, 623–633. 10.1002/mabi.200600069 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Azuma K., Izumi R., Osaki T., Ifuku S., Morimoto M., Saimoto H., et al. . (2015). Chitin, Chitosan, and its derivatives for wound healing: old and new materials. J. Funct. Biomater 6, 104–142. 10.3390/jfb6010104 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Badylak S. F. (2002). The extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 13, 377–383. 10.1016/S1084952102000940 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bainbridge P. (2013). Wound healing and the role of fibroblasts. J. Wound Care 22:407. 10.12968/jowc.2013.22.8.407 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benedetti L., Cortivo R., Berti T., Berti A., Pea F., Mazzo M., et al. . (1993). Biocompatibility and biodegradation of different hyaluronan derivatives (Hyaff) implanted in rats. Biomaterials 14, 1154–1163. 10.1016/0142-9612(93)90160-4 - DOI - PubMed