Sunshine Act: shedding light on inaccurate disclosures at a gynecologic annual meeting
- PMID: 27319366
- PMCID: PMC5207790
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.015
Sunshine Act: shedding light on inaccurate disclosures at a gynecologic annual meeting
Abstract
Background: Physicians and hospital systems often have relationships with biomedical manufacturers to develop new ideas, products, and further education. Because this relationship can influence medical research and practice, reporting disclosures are necessary to reveal any potential bias and inform consumers. The Sunshine Act was created to develop a new reporting system of these financial relationships called the Open Payments database. Currently all disclosures submitted with research to scientific meetings are at the discretion of the physician. We hypothesized that financial relationships between authors and the medical industry are underreported.
Objectives: We aimed to describe concordance between physicians' financial disclosures listed in the abstract book from the 41st annual scientific meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons to physician payments reported to the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services Open Payments database for the same year.
Study design: Authors and scientific committee members responsible for the content of the 41st annual scientific meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons were identified from the published abstract book; each abstract listed disclosures for each author. Abstract disclosures were compared with the transactions recorded on the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services Open Payments database for concordance. Two authors reviewed each nondisclosed Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services listing to determine the relatedness between the company listed on the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services and abstract content.
Results: Abstracts and disclosures of 335 physicians meeting inclusion criteria were reviewed. A total of 209 of 335 physicians (62%) had transactions reported in the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services, which totaled $1.99 million. Twenty-four of 335 physicians (7%) listed companies with their abstracts; 5 of those 24 physicians were concordant with the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services. The total amount of all nondisclosed transactions was $1.3 million. Transactions reported in the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services associated with a single physician ranged from $11.72 to $405,903.36. Of the 209 physicians with Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services transactions that were not disclosed, the majority (68%) had at least 1 company listed in the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services that was determined after review to be related to the subject of their abstract.
Conclusion: Voluntary disclosure of financial relationships was poor, and the majority of unlisted disclosures in the abstract book were companies related to the scientific content of the abstract. Better transparency is needed by physicians responsible for the content presented at gynecological scientific meetings.
Keywords: Open Payments database; Sunshine Act; financial disclosures.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
JC Thompson reports no conflict of interest KA Volpe reports no conflict of interest LK Bridgewater reports no conflict of interest F Qeadan reports no conflict of interest
Figures
Similar articles
-
Discrepancies between author- and industry-reported disclosures of financial relationships at an annual gynecologic oncology research meeting.Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jan;160(1):260-264. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.10.039. Epub 2020 Nov 10. Gynecol Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33187761
-
Accuracy Between AJSM Author-Reported Disclosures and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments Database.Am J Sports Med. 2018 Mar;46(4):969-976. doi: 10.1177/0363546517750124. Epub 2018 Jan 30. Am J Sports Med. 2018. PMID: 29382212
-
Inconsistencies Between Physician-Reported Disclosures at the AAOS Annual Meeting and Industry-Reported Financial Disclosures in the Open Payments Database.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Oct 19;98(20):e90. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01119. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016. PMID: 27869631 Review.
-
Discrepancies in spine surgeon conflict of interest disclosures between a national meeting and physician payment listings on device manufacturer web sites.Spine J. 2013 Dec;13(12):1780-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.05.032. Epub 2013 Jul 3. Spine J. 2013. PMID: 23830826
-
Disclosure of Industry Payments to Physicians: An Epidemiologic Analysis of Early Data From the Open Payments Program.Mayo Clin Proc. 2016 Jan;91(1):84-96. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.10.016. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016. PMID: 26763512 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Impact of Financial Conflict of Interest on Surgical Research: An Observational Study of Published Manuscripts.World J Surg. 2018 Sep;42(9):2757-2762. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4532-y. World J Surg. 2018. PMID: 29426969
-
The Sun Is Still Shining: Nature of Industry Payments to Transplant Surgeons From 2014 to 2019.Transplant Direct. 2022 Apr 21;8(5):e1325. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001325. eCollection 2022 May. Transplant Direct. 2022. PMID: 35474656 Free PMC article.
-
Drivers of the opioid crisis: An appraisal of financial conflicts of interest in clinical practice guideline panels at the peak of opioid prescribing.PLoS One. 2020 Jan 24;15(1):e0227045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227045. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 31978076 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of Conflicts of Interest in Robotic Surgical Studies: Validating Author's Declarations With the Open Payments Database.Ann Surg. 2018 Jul;268(1):86-92. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002420. Ann Surg. 2018. PMID: 28700443 Free PMC article.
-
Undisclosed conflicts of interest among biomedical textbook authors.AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2018 Apr-Jun;9(2):59-68. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1436095. Epub 2018 Mar 5. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2018. PMID: 29400625 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bekelman JE, Li Y, Gross CP. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review. Jama. 2003;289(4):454–465. - PubMed
-
- A. Brichacek JLS. Flexing Their Budgets: Big Pharma Spending Trends. Pharmaceutical Executive. 2001:78–86.
-
- Campbell EG, et al. A national survey of physician-industry relationships. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(17):1742–1750. - PubMed
-
- Chren MM, Landefeld CS. Physicians' behavior and their interactions with drug companies. A controlled study of physicians who requested additions to a hospital drug formulary. Jama. 1994;271(9):684–689. - PubMed
-
- Lurie N, et al. Pharmaceutical representatives in academic medical centers: interaction with faculty and housestaff. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5(3):240–243. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources