Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Sep 1;63(5):604-10.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw363. Epub 2016 Jun 13.

Fluconazole Prophylaxis for the Prevention of Candidiasis in Premature Infants: A Meta-analysis Using Patient-level Data

Collaborators, Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Fluconazole Prophylaxis for the Prevention of Candidiasis in Premature Infants: A Meta-analysis Using Patient-level Data

Jessica E Ericson et al. Clin Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Invasive candidiasis (IC) is an important cause of sepsis in premature infants and is associated with a high risk of death and neurodevelopmental impairment. Prevention of IC has become a major focus in very low birth weight infants, with fluconazole increasingly used as prophylaxis.

Methods: We identified all randomized, placebo-controlled trials evaluating fluconazole prophylaxis in premature infants conducted in the United States. We obtained patient-level data from the study investigators and performed an aggregated analysis. The occurrence of each endpoint in infants who received prophylaxis with fluconazole vs placebo was compared. Endpoints evaluated were IC or death, IC, death, Candida colonization, and fluconazole resistance among tested isolates. Safety endpoints evaluated included clinical and laboratory parameters.

Results: Fluconazole prophylaxis reduced the odds of IC or death, IC, and Candida colonization during the drug exposure period compared with infants given placebo: odds ratios of 0.48 (95% confidence interval [CI], .30-.78), 0.20 (95% CI, .08-.51), and 0.28 (95% CI, .18-.41), respectively. The incidence of clinical and laboratory adverse events was similar for infants who received fluconazole compared with placebo. There was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of tested isolates that were resistant to fluconazole between the fluconazole and placebo groups.

Conclusions: Fluconazole prophylaxis is effective and safe in reducing IC and Candida colonization in premature infants, and has no impact on resistance.

Keywords: fluconazole; candidiasis; meta-analysis; premature infants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Cumulative incidence for the first occurrence of candidiasis or death by study group.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Benjamin DK Jr, Stoll BJ, Fanaroff AA et al. . Neonatal candidiasis among extremely low birth weight infants: risk factors, mortality rates, and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months. Pediatrics 2006; 117:84–92. - PubMed
    1. Aliaga S, Clark RH, Laughon M et al. . Changes in the incidence of candidiasis in neonatal intensive care units. Pediatrics 2014; 133:236–42. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cotten CM, McDonald S, Stoll B, Goldberg RN, Poole K, Benjamin DK Jr. The association of third-generation cephalosporin use and invasive candidiasis in extremely low birth-weight infants. Pediatrics 2006; 118:717–22. - PubMed
    1. Saiman L, Ludington E, Dawson JD et al. . Risk factors for Candida species colonization of neonatal intensive care unit patients. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2001; 20:1119–24. - PubMed
    1. Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes D et al. . Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48:503–35. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms