Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May 1;6(5):973-80.
eCollection 2016.

Molecular characterization of circulating tumor cells in ovarian cancer

Affiliations

Molecular characterization of circulating tumor cells in ovarian cancer

Katarina Kolostova et al. Am J Cancer Res. .

Abstract

The main focus of the study was to detect circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in ovarian cancer (OC) patients using a new methodological approach (MetaCell(TM)) which is based on size-dependent separation of CTCs and subsequent cytomorphological evaluation. Cytomorphological evaluation using vital fluorescence microscopy approach enables to use the captured cells for further RNA/DNA analysis. The cytomorphological analysis is then completed by gene expression analysis (GEA). GEA showed that relative expression of EPCAM is elevated in CTC-enriched fractions in comparison to the whole peripheral blood sample and that the expression grows with in vitro cultivation time. Comparison of the relative gene expression level in the group of peripheral blood samples and CTC-fraction samples confirmed a statistically significant difference for the following genes (p < 0.02): KRT7, WT1, EPCAM, MUC16, MUC1, KRT18 and KRT19. Thus, we suggest that the combination of the above listed genes could confirm CTCs presence in OC patients with higher specificity than when GEA tests are performed for one marker only. The GEA revealed two separate clusters identifying patients with or without CTCs.

Keywords: CTCs; MetaCell; circulating tumor cells; cultivation; gene expression; in vitro; ovarian cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CTCs isolated from patients with ovarian carcinoma, captured on the separation membrane (vital fluorescent staining - NucBlue® and Celltracker®). Bar represents 10 µm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CTCs captured on the separation membrane after immunohistochemistry staining (WT-1 antibody) on Benchmark Ultra automat (Ventana, Roche). Bar represents 10 µm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relative expression of EPCAM RNA in peripheral blood and CTC fractions compared after qPCR analysis.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of averaged relative RNA expression for the genes, shown for all sample types (1-4). Sample type 1 (Peripheral Blood), Sample type 2 (CTC fraction stored immediately after separation process), Sample type 3 (CTC fraction after in vitro culture), Sample type 4 (bottom fraction - cells overgrowing the membrane).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison of the relative gene expression level for the listed genes in the group of peripheral blood (Sample type 1) and CTC-fraction (after 3 days of in vitro culture - Sample type 3). Gene expression levels are relative to the whole peripheral blood data averaged for the patients group. A significant difference was noted for the following genes (p < 0.02): KRT7, WT1, EPCAM, CD68, MUC16, MUC1, KRT18 and KRT19. Thus, we suggest that the combination of the above listed genes should confirm CTCs presence in OC patients with higher specificity than when tests are performed for one marker only.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Cluster analysis for patient - RNA relative amount (log2) of tested genes in all of the tested fracions is shown in colours (please refer to the colour scale on the left). Tested fractions (peripheral blood PK), CTC after isolation (PK IZO), CTC after culture (PK SK), CTC overgrowing the membrane (PK DK). The highest expression of EPCAM was detected in PK SK fraction CTCs on the separation membrane.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Cluster analysis of gene expression data RNA relative amount (log2) for CTC-membrane fractions (PK SK) of all tested patients clearly identifies CTC-positive and CTC-negative group of patients (Higher expression is shown in red).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Josse SA, Pantel K. Biologic challenges in the detection of circulating tumor cells. Cancer Res. 2013;73:8–11. - PubMed
    1. Ning Y, Gerger A, Zhang W, Hanna DL, Yang D, Winder T, Wakatsuki T, Labonte MJ, Stintzing S, Volz N, Sunakawa Y, Stremitzer S, El-Khoueiry R, Lenz HJ. Plastin polymorphisms predict genderand stage-specific colon cancer recurrence after adjuvant chemotherapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13:528–39. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kolostova K, Matkowski R, Jędryka M, Soter K, Cegan M, Pinkas M, Jakabova A, Pavlasek J, Spicka J, Bobek V. The added value of circulating tumor cells examination in ovarian cancer staging. Am J Cancer Res. 2015;5:3363–75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kolostova K, Spicka J, Matkowski R, Bobek V. Isolation, primary culture, morphological and molecular characterization of circulating tumor cells in gynecological cancers. Am J Transl Res. 2015;7:1203–13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herlyn M, Steplewski Z, Herlyn D, Koprowski H. Colorectal carcinoma-specific antigen: detection by means of monoclonal antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979;76:1438–42. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources