How study design affects outcomes in comparisons of therapy. I: Medical
- PMID: 2727468
- DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780080408
How study design affects outcomes in comparisons of therapy. I: Medical
Abstract
We analysed 113 reports published in 1980 in a sample of medical journals to relate features of study design to the magnitude of gains attributed to new therapies over old. Overall we rated 87 per cent of new therapies as improvements over standard therapies. The mean gain (measured by the Mann-Whitney statistic) was relatively constant across study designs, except for non-randomized controlled trials with sequential assignment to therapy, which showed a significantly higher likelihood that a patient would do better on the innovation than on standard therapy (p = 0.004). Randomized controlled trials that did not use a double-blind design had a higher likelihood of showing a gain for the innovation than did double-blind trials (p = 0.02). Any evaluation of an innovation may include both bias and the true efficacy of the new therapy, therefore we may consider making adjustments for the average bias associated with a study design. When interpreting an evaluation of a new therapy, readers should consider the impact of the following average adjustments to the Mann-Whitney statistic: for trials with non-random sequential assignment a decrease of 0.15, for non-double-blind randomized controlled trials a decrease of 0.11.
Similar articles
-
How study design affects outcomes in comparisons of therapy. II: Surgical.Stat Med. 1989 Apr;8(4):455-66. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780080409. Stat Med. 1989. PMID: 2727469
-
Bias in treatment assignment in controlled clinical trials.N Engl J Med. 1984 Jun 14;310(24):1610-2. doi: 10.1056/nejm198406143102419. N Engl J Med. 1984. PMID: 6727931 No abstract available.
-
The design of controlled experiments in the evaluation of non-therapeutic interventions.J Chronic Dis. 1982;35(7):531-8. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(82)90072-8. J Chronic Dis. 1982. PMID: 7085845 No abstract available.
-
Complexity and contradiction in clinical trial research.Am J Med. 1987 Mar;82(3):498-510. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90450-5. Am J Med. 1987. PMID: 3548349 Review.
-
General statistical design considerations of randomized clinical trials.Prog Clin Biol Res. 1988;264:61-70. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1988. PMID: 3289035 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of the Effects of Full Median Sternotomy vs. Mini-Incision on Postoperative Pain in Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 May 15;39(4):e20230154. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0154. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2024. PMID: 38748974 Free PMC article.
-
Phytocannabinoids for the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain: A Scoping Review of Randomised Controlled Trials Published Between 2012 and 2023.Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2024 Mar;28(3):109-118. doi: 10.1007/s11916-023-01196-1. Epub 2023 Dec 14. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2024. PMID: 38095748 Review.
-
An examination of psychometric properties of study quality assessment scales in meta-analysis: Rasch measurement model applied to the firefighter cancer literature.PLoS One. 2023 Jul 26;18(7):e0284469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284469. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37494348 Free PMC article.
-
Is it feasible and ethical to randomize patients between surgery and non-surgical treatments for gastrointestinal cancers?Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 16;13:1119436. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1119436. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37007103 Free PMC article. Review.
-
mHealth interventions to reduce maternal and child mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa and Southern Asia: A systematic literature review.Front Glob Womens Health. 2022 Aug 25;3:942146. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.942146. eCollection 2022. Front Glob Womens Health. 2022. PMID: 36090599 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Medical