Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May 18:6:26276.
doi: 10.1038/srep26276.

Glycans affect DNA extraction and induce substantial differences in gut metagenomic studies

Affiliations

Glycans affect DNA extraction and induce substantial differences in gut metagenomic studies

Emmanouil Angelakis et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Exopolysaccharides produced by bacterial species and present in feces are extremely inhibitory to DNA restriction and can cause discrepancies in metagenomic studies. We determined the effects of different DNA extraction methods on the apparent composition of the gut microbiota using Illumina MiSeq deep sequencing technology. DNA was extracted from the stool from an obese female using 10 different methods and the choice of DNA extraction method affected the proportional abundance at the phylum level, species richness (Chao index, 227 to 2,714) and diversity (non parametric Shannon, 1.37 to 4.4). Moreover DNA was extracted from stools obtained from 83 different individuals by the fastest extraction assay and by an extraction assay that degradated exopolysaccharides. The fastest extraction method was able to detect 68% to 100% genera and 42% to 95% species whereas the glycan degradation extraction method was able to detect 56% to 93% genera and 25% to 87% species. To allow a good liberation of DNA from exopolysaccharides commonly presented in stools, we recommend the mechanical lysis of stools plus glycan degradation, used here for the first time. Caution must be taken in the interpretation of current metagenomic studies, as the efficiency of DNA extraction varies widely among stool samples.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Rarefaction curves relating the sequencing effort to the number of putative species in the samples.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Consensus dendrogram illustrating the similarity of the microbial communities obtained using different DNA extraction methods.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Network of species only detected by each extraction method.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Correlation coefficient of species detected by DNA extraction methods 1 and 5 for 83 stool samples.
Amz, individuals from Amazone; Toua, Touareg individuals; Fr, French individuals; Mrm, Marasmus individuals; KW, kwashiorkor individuals; Ob, obese individuals Blue color, genera coefficient; red color, species coefficient. Correlation coefficient was estimated for each sample using the number of shared species between methods over the total number of species/genus identified.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Angelakis E. et al. A Metagenomic Investigation of the Duodenal Microbiota Reveals Links with Obesity. PloS One. 10, e0137784 (2015). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Angelakis E., Armougom F., Million M. & Raoult D. The relationship between gut microbiota and weight gain in humans. Future. Microbiol 7, 91–109 (2012). - PubMed
    1. Angelakis E., Merhej V. & Raoult D. Related actions of probiotics and antibiotics on gut microbiota and weight modification. Lancet Infect Dis 13, 889–899 (2013). - PubMed
    1. Lozupone C. A. et al. Meta-analyses of studies of the human microbiota. Genome Res. 23, 1704–1714 (2013). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lagier J. C., Million M., Hugon P., Armougom F. & Raoult D. Human gut microbiota: repertoire and variations. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2, 136 (2012). - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms