Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jun;208(6):522-31.
doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.115.164715. Epub 2016 Apr 7.

Transcranial direct current stimulation for acute major depressive episodes: meta-analysis of individual patient data

Affiliations
Review

Transcranial direct current stimulation for acute major depressive episodes: meta-analysis of individual patient data

André R Brunoni et al. Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-pharmacological intervention for depression. It has mixed results, possibly caused by study heterogeneity.

Aims: To assess tDCS efficacy and to explore individual response predictors.

Method: Systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.

Results: Data were gathered from six randomised sham-controlled trials, enrolling 289 patients. Active tDCS was significantly superior to sham for response (34% v. 19% respectively, odds ratio (OR) = 2.44, 95% CI 1.38-4.32, number needed to treat (NNT) = 7), remission (23.1% v. 12.7% respectively, OR = 2.38, 95% CI 1.22-4.64, NNT = 9) and depression improvement (B coefficient 0.35, 95% CI 0.12-0.57). Mixed-effects models showed that, after adjustment for other predictors and confounders, treatment-resistant depression and higher tDCS 'doses' were, respectively, negatively and positively associated with tDCS efficacy.

Conclusions: The effect size of tDCS treatment was comparable with those reported for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and antidepressant drug treatment in primary care. The most important parameters for optimisation in future trials are depression refractoriness and tDCS dose.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interest

Z.J.D. has served on the advisory board for Sunovion, Hoffmann-La Roche Limited and Merck, and received speaker support from Eli Lilly.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Individual patient data meta-analysis comparing active v. sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in terms of (a) response; (b) remission and (c) depression improvement. Forest plot graphically illustrating the comparative efficacy of active with sham tDCS. For each study the relative strength of treatment effects is represented, the square represents the relative weight of each study, the vertical bar is the 95% confidence interval. The rhombus represents the overall effect. Values >1 and >0 v. <1 and <0 represent positive and negative effects of active v. sham tDCS for categorical and continuous outcomes respectively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brunoni AR, Nitsche MA, Bolognini N, Bikson M, Wagner T, Merabet L, et al. Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions. Brain Stimul 2012; 5: 175–95. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brunoni AR, Ferrucci R, Fregni F, Boggio PS, Priori A. Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of major depressive disorder: a summary of preclinical, clinical and translational findings. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2012; 39: 9–16. - PubMed
    1. Kalu UG, Sexton CE, Loo CK, Ebmeier KP. Transcranial direct current stimulation in the treatment of major depression: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2012; 42: 1791–800. - PubMed
    1. Berlim MT, Van den Eynde F, Daskalakis ZJ. Clinical utility of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for treating major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials. J Psychiatr Res 2013; 47: 1–7. - PubMed
    1. Shiozawa P, Fregni F, Bensenor IM, Lotufo PA, Berlim MT, Daskalakis JZ, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation for major depression: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2014; 17: 1443–52. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Grants and funding