Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar;26(3):342-50.
doi: 10.1101/gr.193474.115. Epub 2016 Feb 4.

Chromosome-scale shotgun assembly using an in vitro method for long-range linkage

Nicholas H Putnam  1 , Brendan L O'Connell  2 , Jonathan C Stites  1 , Brandon J Rice  1 , Marco Blanchette  1 , Robert Calef  1 , Christopher J Troll  1 , Andrew Fields  1 , Paul D Hartley  1 , Charles W Sugnet  1 , David Haussler  3 , Daniel S Rokhsar  4 , Richard E Green  2
Affiliations

Chromosome-scale shotgun assembly using an in vitro method for long-range linkage

Nicholas H Putnam et al. Genome Res. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Long-range and highly accurate de novo assembly from short-read data is one of the most pressing challenges in genomics. Recently, it has been shown that read pairs generated by proximity ligation of DNA in chromatin of living tissue can address this problem, dramatically increasing the scaffold contiguity of assemblies. Here, we describe a simpler approach ("Chicago") based on in vitro reconstituted chromatin. We generated two Chicago data sets with human DNA and developed a statistical model and a new software pipeline ("HiRise") that can identify poor quality joins and produce accurate, long-range sequence scaffolds. We used these to construct a highly accurate de novo assembly and scaffolding of a human genome with scaffold N50 of 20 Mbp. We also demonstrated the utility of Chicago for improving existing assemblies by reassembling and scaffolding the genome of the American alligator. With a single library and one lane of Illumina HiSeq sequencing, we increased the scaffold N50 of the American alligator from 508 kbp to 10 Mbp.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A diagram of a Chicago library generation protocol. (A) Chromatin (nucleosomes in blue) is reconstituted in vitro upon naked DNA (black strand). (B) Chromatin is fixed with formaldehyde (thin red lines are crosslinks). (C) Fixed chromatin is cut with a restriction enzyme, generating free sticky ends (performed on streptavidin-coated beads; data not shown). (D) Sticky ends are filled in with biotinylated (blue circles) and thiolated (green squares) nucleotides. (E) Free blunt ends are ligated (ligations indicated by red asterisks). (F) Crosslinks are reversed and proteins removed to yield library fragments, which are then digested with an exonuclease to remove the terminal biotinylated nucleotides. The thiolated nucleotides protect the interior of the library fragments from digestion.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Histogram of read pair separations for several sequencing libraries mapped to hg19. (Black) Chicago library L1, prepared with MboI and 150-kbp input DNA; (red) Chicago library L2, prepared with MluCI and 150-kbp input DNA; and (violet) Chicago library L3, prepared with 500-kbp input DNA. A human Hi-C library (Kalhor et al. 2012) is shown in dark blue for comparison.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Genome coverage (sum of read pair separations divided by estimated genome size) in various read pair separation bins.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
The mapped locations on the GRCh38 reference sequence of Chicago read pairs are plotted in the vicinity of structural differences between GM12878 and the reference (A, deletion; B, inversion). Each Chicago pair is represented both above and below the diagonal. Above the diagonal, color indicates map quality score on the scale shown; below the diagonal, colors indicate the inferred haplotype phase of Chicago pairs based on overlap with phased SNPs, with read pairs of unknown haplotype origin shown in gray.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Adey A, Kitzman JO, Burton JN, Daza R, Kumar A, Christiansen L, Ronaghi M, Amini S, Gunderson KL, Steemers FJ, et al. 2014. In vitro, long-range sequence information for de novo genome assembly via transposase contiguity. Genome Res 24: 2041–2049. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alkan C, Sajjadian S, Eichler EE. 2011. Limitations of next-generation genome sequence assembly. Nat Methods 8: 61–65. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amini S, Pushkarev D, Christiansen L, Kostem E, Royce T, Turk C, Pignatelli N, Adey A, Kitzman JO, Vijayan K, et al. 2014. Haplotype-resolved whole-genome sequencing by contiguity-preserving transposition and combinatorial indexing. Nat Genet 46: 1343–1349. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30: 2114–2120. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bradnam KR, Fass JN, Alexandrov A, Baranay P, Bechner M, Birol I, Boisvert S, Chapman JA, Chapuis G, Chikhi R, et al. 2013. Assemblathon 2: evaluating de novo methods of genome assembly in three vertebrate species. Gigascience 2: 10. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types