Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct;75(10):1757-62.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208001. Epub 2015 Nov 6.

Increased pretreatment serum IFN-β/α ratio predicts non-response to tumour necrosis factor α inhibition in rheumatoid arthritis

Affiliations

Increased pretreatment serum IFN-β/α ratio predicts non-response to tumour necrosis factor α inhibition in rheumatoid arthritis

Theresa Wampler Muskardin et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: Studies suggest that circulating type I interferon (IFN) may predict response to biological agents in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Prediction of response prior to initiating therapy would represent a major advancement.

Methods: We studied sera from a test set of 32 patients with RA from the Auto-immune Biomarkers Collaborative Network Consortium and a validation set of 92 patients with RA from the Treatment Efficacy and Toxicity in Rheumatoid Arthritis Database and Repository registry. The test set included those with good response or no response to tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors at 14 weeks by European League Against Rheumatism criteria. The validation set included subjects with good, moderate or no response at 12 weeks. Total serum type I IFN activity, IFN-α and IFN-β activity were measured using a functional reporter cell assay.

Results: In the test set, an increased ratio of IFN-β to IFN-α (IFN-β/α activity ratio) in pretreatment serum associated with lack of response to TNF inhibition (p=0.013). Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody titre and class of TNF inhibitor did not influence this relationship. A receiver-operator curve supported a ratio of 1.3 as the optimal cut-off. In the validation set, subjects with an IFN-β/α activity ratio >1.3 were significantly more likely to have non-response than good response (OR=6.67, p=0.018). The test had 77% specificity and 45% sensitivity for prediction of non-response compared with moderate or good response. Meta-analysis of test and validation sets confirmed strong predictive capacity of IFN-β/α activity ratio (p=0.005).

Conclusions: Increased pretreatment serum IFN-β/α ratio strongly associated with non-response to TNF inhibition. This study supports further investigation of serum type I IFN in predicting outcome of TNF inhibition in RA.

Keywords: Cytokines; Rheumatoid Arthritis; TNF-alpha; Treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Non-parametric correlation of pretreatment serum interferon (IFN)-β/α activity ratio and disease activity score 28 (DAS28) score at 14 weeks. r and p value by Spearman’s rank order correlation test. Pre-TNFi, prior to tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibition.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver–operator curve for pretreatment interferon (IFN)-β/α activity ratio predicting response by European League Against Rheumatism criteria at 14 weeks. Point corresponding to an IFN-β/α activity ratio of 1.3 is indicated by the arrow.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Serum type I interferon (IFN) activity prior to tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitor therapy in the combined test and validation cohort. (A) Pretreatment IFN-β activity in subjects who had a good or moderate response to TNF-α inhibition at 12–14 weeks compared with those who had non-response by European League Against Rheumatism criteria. (B) IFN-β/α activity ratio in pretreatment sera in good or moderate responders and non-responders. Line indicates the median, error bars show the IQR, p value by Mann–Whitney U test.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Serum type I interferon (IFN) activity measurements prior to and 4–6 weeks after starting tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitor therapy. (A–C) Type I IFN, IFN-β and IFN-β/α, respectively, in patients with non-response. (D–F) Type I IFN, IFN-β and IFN-β/α, respectively, in patients with good or moderate response. Line indicates the median, error bars show the IQR, p value by Mann–Whitney U test.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Finckh A, Liang MH, van Herckenrode CM, et al. Long-term impact of early treatment on radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55:864–872. - PubMed
    1. Boers M. Understanding the window of opportunity concept in early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:1771–1774. - PubMed
    1. Palucka AK, Blanck JP, Bennett L, et al. Cross-regulation of TNF and IFN-alpha in autoimmune diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:3372–3377. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cantaert T, Baeten D, Tak PP, et al. Type I IFN and TNFα cross-regulation in immune-mediated inflammatory disease: basic concepts and clinical relevance. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12:219. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mavragani CP, Niewold TB, Moutsopoulos NM, et al. Augmented interferon-alpha pathway activation in patients with Sjögren’s syndrome treated with etanercept. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:3995–4004. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms