Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun 24;10(6):e0129506.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129506. eCollection 2015.

Biomedical Data Sharing and Reuse: Attitudes and Practices of Clinical and Scientific Research Staff

Affiliations

Biomedical Data Sharing and Reuse: Attitudes and Practices of Clinical and Scientific Research Staff

Lisa M Federer et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Significant efforts are underway within the biomedical research community to encourage sharing and reuse of research data in order to enhance research reproducibility and enable scientific discovery. While some technological challenges do exist, many of the barriers to sharing and reuse are social in nature, arising from researchers' concerns about and attitudes toward sharing their data. In addition, clinical and basic science researchers face their own unique sets of challenges to sharing data within their communities. This study investigates these differences in experiences with and perceptions about sharing data, as well as barriers to sharing among clinical and basic science researchers.

Methods: Clinical and basic science researchers in the Intramural Research Program at the National Institutes of Health were surveyed about their attitudes toward and experiences with sharing and reusing research data. Of 190 respondents to the survey, the 135 respondents who identified themselves as clinical or basic science researchers were included in this analysis. Odds ratio and Fisher's exact tests were the primary methods to examine potential relationships between variables. Worst-case scenario sensitivity tests were conducted when necessary.

Results and discussion: While most respondents considered data sharing and reuse important to their work, they generally rated their expertise as low. Sharing data directly with other researchers was common, but most respondents did not have experience with uploading data to a repository. A number of significant differences exist between the attitudes and practices of clinical and basic science researchers, including their motivations for sharing, their reasons for not sharing, and the amount of work required to prepare their data.

Conclusions: Even within the scope of biomedical research, addressing the unique concerns of diverse research communities is important to encouraging researchers to share and reuse data. Efforts at promoting data sharing and reuse should be aimed at solving not only technological problems, but also addressing researchers' concerns about sharing their data. Given the varied practices of individual researchers and research communities, standardizing data practices like data citation and repository upload could make sharing and reuse easier.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Comparison of self-rated relevance and expertise regarding reusing data among clinical and scientific research staff.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Comparison of self-rated relevance and expertise regarding sharing data in a repository among clinical and scientific research staff.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Butte AJ, Ito S. Translational bioinformatics: Data-driven drug discovery and development. Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. 2012;91(6):949–52. 10.1038/clpt.2012.55 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Choi IY, Kim TM, Kim MS, Mun SK, Chung YJ. Perspectives on clinical informatics: Integrating large-scale clinical, genomic, and health information for clinical care. Genomics & informatics. 2013;11(4):186–90. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perrino T, Howe G, Sperling A, Beardslee W, Sandler I, Shern D, et al. Advancing science through collaborative data sharing and synthesis. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013;8(4):433–44. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson BJ, Merry AF. Data sharing for pharmacokinetic studies. Paediatric anaesthesia. 2009;19(10):1005–10. 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.03051.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Collins FS, Tabak LA. NIH plans to enhance reproducibility. Nature. 2014;505:612–3. - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding

The authors have no support or funding to report.

LinkOut - more resources