Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May 6;7(5):3252-63.
doi: 10.3390/nu7053252.

Determination of zinc status in humans: which indicator should we use?

Frank T Wieringa  1 , Marjoleine A Dijkhuizen  2 , Marion Fiorentino  3 , Arnauld Laillou  4 , Jacques Berger  5
Affiliations

Determination of zinc status in humans: which indicator should we use?

Frank T Wieringa et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Zinc deficiency has serious wide-ranging health consequences and is thought to be one of the most prevalent micronutrient deficiencies in the world. However, reliable indicators or biomarkers to assess zinc status are not available at present. Indirect indicators such as the prevalence of stunting or anemia, iron deficiency, as well as more direct indicators such as plasma zinc concentrations are being used at present to estimate the prevalence of zinc deficiency in populations. However, as this paper shows by using data from a recent national micronutrient survey in Vietnam, the estimates of the prevalence of zinc deficiency using these different indicators can vary widely, leading to inconsistencies. In this paper, zinc deficiency among children is four times more prevalent than iron deficiency and 2.3 times more than stunting prevalence for example. This can lead not only to confusion concerning the real extent of the prevalence of zinc deficiency in populations, but also makes it hard to inform policy on whether action is needed or not. Moreover, evaluation of programs is hampered by the lack of a clear indicator. Efforts should be made to identify the most suitable indicator to evaluate the impact of programs aimed at improving zinc status and health of populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Hotz C., Brown K.H. Assessment of the Risk of Zinc Deficiency in Populations and Options for its Control. IZINCG Technical Document #1. International Nutrition Foundation for United Nations University Press; Tokyo, Japan: 2004. - PubMed
    1. Prasad A.S., Halsted J.A., Nadimi M. Syndrome of iron deficiency, anemia, hepatosplenomegaly, hypogonadism, dwarfism, and geophagia. Am. J. Med. 1961;31:532–546. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(61)90137-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hambidge M. Human zinc deficiency. J. Nutr. 2000;130:1344S–1349S. - PubMed
    1. Black R.E., Victora C.G., Walker S.P., Bhutta Z.A., Christian P., de Onis M., Ezzati M., Grantham-McGregor S., Katz J., Martorell R., et al. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2013;382:427–451. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60937-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. WHO . Indicators for Assessing Vitamin A Deficiency and Their Application in Monitoring and Evaluating Intervention Programmes. WHO; Geneva, Switzerland: 1996.

LinkOut - more resources