Potential Risks and Benefits of Gain-of-Function Research: Summary of a Workshop
- PMID: 25719185
- Bookshelf ID: NBK274343
- DOI: 10.17226/21666
Potential Risks and Benefits of Gain-of-Function Research: Summary of a Workshop
Excerpt
On October 17, 2014, spurred by incidents at U.S. government laboratories that raised serious biosafety concerns, the United States government launched a one-year deliberative process to address the continuing controversy surrounding so-called “gain-of-function” (GOF) research on respiratory pathogens with pandemic potential. The gain of function controversy began in late 2011 with the question of whether to publish the results of two experiments involving H5N1 avian influenza and continued to focus on certain research with highly pathogenic avian influenza over the next three years. The heart of the U.S. process is an evaluation of the potential risks and benefits of certain types of GOF experiments with influenza, SARS, and MERS viruses that would inform the development and adoption of a new U.S. Government policy governing the funding and conduct of GOF research.
Potential Risks and Benefits of Gain-of-Function Research is the summary of a two-day public symposia on GOF research. Convened in December 2014 by the Institute of Medicine and the National Research Council, the main focus of this event was to discuss principles important for, and key considerations in, the design of risk and benefit assessments of GOF research. Participants examined the underlying scientific and technical questions that are the source of current discussion and debate over GOF research involving pathogens with pandemic potential. This report is a record of the presentations and discussion of the meeting.
Copyright 2015 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Sections
- THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES
- COMMITTEE ON GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH WITH H5N1/H7N9 AVIAN INFLUENZA: A SYMPOSIUM
- BOARD ON LIFE SCIENCES
- COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND LAW
- BOARD ON HEALTH SCIENCES POLICY
- Acknowledgments
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Assessing Risks and Benefits
- 3. Gain-of-Function Research: Background and Alternatives
- 4. Potential Benefits of Gain-of-Function Research
- 5. Potential Risks: Biosafety and Biosecurity
- 6. Policy Implications
- References
- APPENDIXES
Similar articles
-
Gain-of-Function Research: Ethical Analysis.Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Aug;22(4):923-964. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9810-1. Epub 2016 Aug 8. Sci Eng Ethics. 2016. PMID: 27502512 Free PMC article.
-
Gain-of-Function Research: Summary of the Second Symposium, March 10-11, 2016.Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2016 Jun 20. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2016 Jun 20. PMID: 27403489 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Comparison of International Guidance for Biosafety Regarding Work Conducted at Biosafety Level 3 (BSL-3) and Gain-of-Function (GOF) Experiments.Appl Biosaf. 2016 Sep 1;21(3):128-141. doi: 10.1177/1535676016661772. Epub 2016 Sep 1. Appl Biosaf. 2016. PMID: 36090805 Free PMC article.
-
Biosafety Recommendations for Work with Influenza Viruses Containing a Hemagglutinin from the A/goose/Guangdong/1/96 Lineage.MMWR Recomm Rep. 2013 Jun 28;62(RR-06):1-7. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2013. PMID: 23803973
-
Gain-of-function experiments: time for a real debate.Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015 Jan;13(1):58-64. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3405. Epub 2014 Dec 8. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015. PMID: 25482289 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous