Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug;3(3):71-85.

An improvement of the 2ˆ(-delta delta CT) method for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction data analysis

Xiayu Rao  1 , Xuelin Huang  2 , Zhicheng Zhou  3 , Xin Lin  3
Affiliations

An improvement of the 2ˆ(-delta delta CT) method for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction data analysis

Xiayu Rao et al. Biostat Bioinforma Biomath. 2013 Aug.

Abstract

Background: The 2-ΔΔCT method has been extensively used as a relative quantification strategy for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) data analysis. This method is a convenient way to calculate relative gene expression levels between different samples in that it directly uses the threshold cycles (CTs) generated by the qPCR system for calculation. However, this approach relies heavily on an invalid assumption of 100% PCR amplification efficiency across all samples. In addition, the 2-ΔΔCT method is applied to data with automatic removal of background fluorescence by the qPCR software. Since the background fluorescence is unknown, subtracting an inaccurate background can lead to distortion of the results. To address these problems, we present an improved method, the individual efficiency corrected calculation.

Results: Our method takes into account the PCR efficiency of each individual sample. In addition, it eliminates the need for background fluorescence estimation or subtraction because the background can be cancelled out using the differencing strategy. The DNA amount for a certain gene and the relative DNA amount among different samples estimated using our method were closer to the true values compared to the results of the 2-ΔΔCT method.

Conclusions: The improved method, the individual efficiency corrected calculation, produces more accurate estimates in relative gene expression than the 2-ΔΔCT method and is thus a better way to calculate relative gene expression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Methods. Vol. 25. San Diego, CA: 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method; pp. 402–408. - PubMed
    1. Pfaffl MW. Quantification strategies in real-time PCR. In: Bustin SA, editor. The Real-Time PCR Encyclopedia A–Z of Quantitative PCR. International University Line; La Jolla, CA: 2004. pp. 87–112. Published by.
    1. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc. 2008;3:1101–1108. - PubMed
    1. Bustin SA. Quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR): trends and problems. J Mol Endocrinol. 2002;29:23–39. - PubMed
    1. Schmittgen TD, Zakrajsek BA, Mills AG, Gorn V, Singer MJ, Reed MW. Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction to study mRNA decay: comparison of endpoint and real-time methods. Analytical biochemistry. 2000;285:194–204. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources