Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Nov;10(11):634-42.
doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.181. Epub 2014 Sep 30.

Classifying neurocognitive disorders: the DSM-5 approach

Affiliations
Review

Classifying neurocognitive disorders: the DSM-5 approach

Perminder S Sachdev et al. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014 Nov.

Abstract

Neurocognitive disorders--including delirium, mild cognitive impairment and dementia--are characterized by decline from a previously attained level of cognitive functioning. These disorders have diverse clinical characteristics and aetiologies, with Alzheimer disease, cerebrovascular disease, Lewy body disease, frontotemporal degeneration, traumatic brain injury, infections, and alcohol abuse representing common causes. This diversity is reflected by the variety of approaches to classifying these disorders, with separate groups determining criteria for each disorder on the basis of aetiology. As a result, there is now an array of terms to describe cognitive syndromes, various definitions for the same syndrome, and often multiple criteria to determine a specific aetiology. The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) provides a common framework for the diagnosis of neurocognitive disorders, first by describing the main cognitive syndromes, and then defining criteria to delineate specific aetiological subtypes of mild and major neurocognitive disorders. The DSM-5 approach builds on the expectation that clinicians and research groups will welcome a common language to deal with the neurocognitive disorders. As the use of these criteria becomes more widespread, a common international classification for these disorders could emerge for the first time, thus promoting efficient communication among clinicians and researchers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stroke. 2011 Sep;42(9):2672-713 - PubMed
    1. Psychol Med. 2009 Dec;39(12):2001-12 - PubMed
    1. Brain. 2011 Sep;134(Pt 9):2456-77 - PubMed
    1. J Intern Med. 2004 Sep;256(3):183-94 - PubMed
    1. Neurology. 2007 Oct 30;69(18):1789-99 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms