Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul 16;9(7):e102519.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102519. eCollection 2014.

Type II transmembrane serine protease gene variants associate with breast cancer

Affiliations

Type II transmembrane serine protease gene variants associate with breast cancer

Kaisa Luostari et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Type II transmembrane serine proteases (TTSPs) are related to tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis in cancer. Genetic variants in these genes may alter their function, leading to cancer onset and progression, and affect patient outcome. Here, 464 breast cancer cases and 370 controls were genotyped for 82 single-nucleotide polymorphisms covering eight genes. Association of the genotypes was estimated against breast cancer risk, breast cancer-specific survival, and survival in different treatment groups, and clinicopathological variables. SNPs in TMPRSS3 (rs3814903 and rs11203200), TMPRSS7 (rs1844925), and HGF (rs5745752) associated significantly with breast cancer risk (Ptrend = 0.008-0.042). SNPs in TMPRSS1 (rs12151195 and rs12461158), TMPRSS2 (rs2276205), TMPRSS3 (rs3814903), and TMPRSS7 (rs2399403) associated with prognosis (P = 0.004-0.046). When estimating the combined effect of the variants, the risk of breast cancer was higher with 4-5 alleles present compared to 0-2 alleles (P = 0.0001; OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.39-3.94). Women with 6-8 survival-associating alleles had a 3.3 times higher risk of dying of breast cancer compared to women with 1-3 alleles (P = 0.001; HR, 3.30; 95% CI, 1.58-6.88). The results demonstrate the combined effect of variants in TTSPs and their related genes in breast cancer risk and patient outcome. Functional analysis of these variants will lead to further understanding of this gene family, which may improve individualized risk estimation and development of new strategies for treatment of breast cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: Arto Mannermaa is a PLOS ONE Editorial Board member. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to PLOS ONE Editorial policies and criteria.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. BCSS in multivariate analysis (Cox regression).
A, rs12151195; B, rs12461158; C, rs2276205; D, rs3814903; E, rs2399403 genotypes; and F, combined risk allele variable. Age, tumor grade, histological type, tumor size, nodal status, ER status, and HER2 status were included in the multivariate analysis. P≤0.05 was considered significant.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stratton MR, Rahman N (2008) The emerging landscape of breast cancer susceptibility. Nat Genet 40: 17–22. - PubMed
    1. Michailidou K, Hall P, Gonzalez-Neira A, Ghoussaini M, Dennis J, et al. (2013) Large-scale genotyping identifies 41 new loci associated with breast cancer risk. Nat Genet 45: 353–361. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burton H, Chowdhury S, Dent T, Hall A, Pashayan N, et al. (2013) Public health implications from COGS and potential for risk stratification and screening. Nat Genet 45: 349–351. - PubMed
    1. Bugge TH, Antalis TM, Wu Q (2009) Type II transmembrane serine proteases. J Biol Chem 284: 23177–23181. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hooper JD, Clements JA, Quigley JP, Antalis TM (2001) Type II transmembrane serine proteases. insights into an emerging class of cell surface proteolytic enzymes. J Biol Chem 276: 857–860. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Grants and funding

The KBCP was financially supported by grants from the special Government Funding (EVO) of Kuopio University Hospital (www.psshp.fi), the Cancer Fund of Northern Savo (www.pohjois-savonsyopayhdistys.fi), the Finnish Cancer Organizations (www.cancer.fi), the Academy of Finland (www.aka.fi), and by the strategic funding of the University of Eastern Finland (www.uef.fi). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.