Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun 23;205(6):759-69.
doi: 10.1083/jcb.201401126.

Bridging the gap: membrane contact sites in signaling, metabolism, and organelle dynamics

William A Prinz  1
Affiliations

Bridging the gap: membrane contact sites in signaling, metabolism, and organelle dynamics

William A Prinz. J Cell Biol. .

Abstract

Regions of close apposition between two organelles, often referred to as membrane contact sites (MCSs), mostly form between the endoplasmic reticulum and a second organelle, although contacts between mitochondria and other organelles have also begun to be characterized. Although these contact sites have been noted since cells first began to be visualized with electron microscopy, the functions of most of these domains long remained unclear. The last few years have witnessed a dramatic increase in our understanding of MCSs, revealing the critical roles they play in intracellular signaling, metabolism, the trafficking of metabolites, and organelle inheritance, division, and transport.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Proteins proposed to mediate tethering at MCSs. Mammalian proteins are shown on a yellow background, yeast proteins on a blue background, and proteins found in both mammals and yeast are on a green background. Tethering complexes not described in the text are indicated with red numbers: (1) StARD3-VAPs (Alpy et al., 2013), (2) NPC1-ORP5 (Du et al., 2011), (3) Psd2-Pdr17 (Riekhof et al., 2014), (4) Vac8-Nvj1 (Pan et al., 2000), (5) Nvj2 (Toulmay and Prinz, 2012), (6) PTPIP51-VAPs (De Vos et al., 2012), (7) Orai1-STIM1 (Nunes et al., 2012), (8) DGAT2-FATP1 (Xu et al., 2012), and (9) IncD-CERT-VAPs (Derré et al., 2011; Elwell et al., 2011).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Possible mechanisms of lipid exchange at MCSs. (A) Transfer by LTPs using CERT as an example. The targeting PH domain (pink) and FFAT motif (blue) are shown. CERT could shuttle between membranes (left) or transfer while binding both membranes (right). (B) Some transfer could occur through hydrophobic channels or tunnels (in green) bridging the two membranes at a MCS. (C) Lipid exchange between hemifused membranes. Hemifusion could be promoted and regulated by proteins (red).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Ca2+ trafficking at ER–PM MCSs. (A) In muscle cells, the interaction of the RyR in the SR and with DHPR in the PM allows the coordinated release of Ca2+ during muscle excitation and contraction. See text for details. (B) When STIM1 senses low Ca2+ concentration in the ER, it undergoes a conformational change that allows it to oligomerize and bind to the PM, to the protein Orai1, and to accumulate at ER–PM MCSs. Ca2+ influx at these sites facilitates Ca2+ import into the ER by sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA). (C) Calcium channeling from the ER lumen to the mitochondrial matrix. Calcium exits the ER through the inositol trisphosphate receptor (IP3R) channel, enters mitochondria via VDAC, and then uses the mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter (MCU) to move into the mitochondrial matrix.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Model of ER-mediated regulation of mitochondrial fission at sites of contact. (A) The ER and mitochondria are tethered by ERMES in yeast (other tethers are used in higher eukaryotes). (B) The ER encircles mitochondria at sites where division will occur. (C) Actin polymerization facilitated by formin 2 may cause mitochondrial constriction. (D) The dynamin-like protein Drp1 is recruited to the mitochondrial surface, where it multimerizes and causes mitochondrial scission. (E) After fission, the ER remains associated with the mitochondrion that retains the ERMES complex.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Alpy F., Rousseau A., Schwab Y., Legueux F., Stoll I., Wendling C., Spiegelhalter C., Kessler P., Mathelin C., Rio M.C., et al. 2013. STARD3 or STARD3NL and VAP form a novel molecular tether between late endosomes and the ER. J. Cell Sci. 126:5500–5512 10.1242/jcs.139295 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderie I., Schulz I., Schmid A. 2007. Direct interaction between ER membrane-bound PTP1B and its plasma membrane-anchored targets. Cell. Signal. 19:582–592 10.1016/j.cellsig.2006.08.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andersson M.X., Goksör M., Sandelius A.S. 2007. Membrane contact sites: physical attachment between chloroplasts and endoplasmic reticulum revealed by optical manipulation. Plant Signal. Behav. 2:185–187 10.4161/psb.2.3.3973 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bannister R.A. 2007. Bridging the myoplasmic gap: recent developments in skeletal muscle excitation-contraction coupling. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 28:275–283 10.1007/s10974-007-9118-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barr F.A., Puype M., Vandekerckhove J., Warren G. 1997. GRASP65, a protein involved in the stacking of Golgi cisternae. Cell. 91:253–262 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80407-9 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types