Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Sep;15(7):660-666.
doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000156.

Understanding the global epidemiology of pediatric critical illness: the power, pitfalls, and practicalities of point prevalence studies

Affiliations
Review

Understanding the global epidemiology of pediatric critical illness: the power, pitfalls, and practicalities of point prevalence studies

Scott L Weiss et al. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: The point prevalence methodology is a valuable epidemiological study design that can optimize patient enrollment, prospectively gather individual-level data, and measure practice variability across a large number of geographic regions and healthcare settings. The objective of this article is to review the design, implementation, and analysis of recent point prevalence studies investigating the global epidemiology of pediatric critical illness.

Data sources: Literature review and primary datasets.

Study selection: Multicenter, international point prevalence studies performed in PICUs since 2007.

Data extraction: Study topic, number of sites, number of study days, patients screened, prevalence of disease, use of specified therapies, and outcomes.

Data synthesis: Since 2007, five-point prevalence studies have been performed on acute lung injury, neurologic disease, thromboprophylaxis, fluid resuscitation, and sepsis in PICUs. These studies were performed in 59-120 sites in 7-28 countries. All studies accounted for seasonal variation in pediatric disease by collecting data over multiple study days. Studies screened up to 6,317 patients and reported data on prevalence and therapeutic variability. Three studies also reported short-term outcomes, a valuable but atypical data element in point prevalence studies. Using these five studies as examples, the advantages and disadvantages and approach to designing, implementing, and analyzing point prevalence studies are reviewed.

Conclusions: Point prevalence studies in pediatric critical care can efficiently provide valuable insight on the global epidemiology of disease and practice patterns for critically ill children.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Martin G. Epidemiology studies in critical care. Crit Care. 2006;10(2):136. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Willson DF, Dean JM, Newth C, et al. Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network (CPCCRN) Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2006;7(4):301–307. - PubMed
    1. Randolph AG, Gonzales CA, Cortellini L, et al. Growth of pediatric intensive care units in the United States from 1995 to 2001. J Pediatr. 2004;144(6):792–798. - PubMed
    1. Odetola FO, Clark SJ, Freed GL, et al. A national survey of pediatric critical care resources in the United States. Pediatrics. 2005;115(4):e382–386. - PubMed
    1. Haut ER, Pronovost PJ, Schneider EB. Limitations of administrative databases. JAMA. 2012;307(24):2589. author reply 2589-2590. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms