Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul 15;59(2):160-5.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu226. Epub 2014 Apr 9.

Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: a case-control study of hospitalized patients

Affiliations

Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: a case-control study of hospitalized patients

Jaffar A Al-Tawfiq et al. Clin Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: There is a paucity of data regarding the differentiating characteristics of patients with laboratory-confirmed and those negative for Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV).

Methods: This is a hospital-based case-control study comparing MERS-CoV-positive patients (cases) with MERS-CoV-negative controls.

Results: A total of 17 case patients and 82 controls with a mean age of 60.7 years and 57 years, respectively (P = .553), were included. No statistical differences were observed in relation to sex, the presence of a fever or cough, and the presence of a single or multilobar infiltrate on chest radiography. The case patients were more likely to be overweight than the control group (mean body mass index, 32 vs 27.8; P = .035), to have diabetes mellitus (87% vs 47%; odds ratio [OR], 7.24; P = .015), and to have end-stage renal disease (33% vs 7%; OR, 7; P = .012). At the time of admission, tachypnea (27% vs 60%; OR, 0.24; P = .031) and respiratory distress (15% vs 51%; OR, 0.15; P = .012) were less frequent among case patients. MERS-CoV patients were more likely to have a normal white blood cell count than the control group (82% vs 52%; OR, 4.33; P = .029). Admission chest radiography with interstitial infiltrates was more frequent in case patients than in controls (67% vs 20%; OR, 8.13; P = .001). Case patients were more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit (53% vs 20%; OR, 4.65; P = .025) and to have a high mortality rate (76% vs 15%; OR, 18.96; P < .001).

Conclusions: Few clinical predictors could enhance the ability to predict which patients with pneumonia would have MERS-CoV. However, further prospective analysis and matched case-control studies may shed light on other predictors of infection.

Keywords: MERS; case-control; coronavirus; radiographic characteristics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A portable anterior–posterior chest radiograph showing interstitial infiltrate in a patient with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan-Meier survival curve. Numbers on the lines represent the number of patients still alive at each day.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zaki AM, van Boheemen S, Bestebroer TM, Osterhaus AD, Fouchier RA. Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1814–20. - PubMed
    1. Hijawi B, Abdallat M, Sayaydeh A, et al. Novel coronavirus infections in Jordan, April 2012: epidemiological findings from a retrospective investigation. East Mediterr Health J. 2013;19(suppl 1):S12–8. - PubMed
    1. Joint Kingdom of Saudi Arabia/WHO mission. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: 2013. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Available at: http://www.who.int/csr/disease/coronavirus_infections/MERSCov_WHO_KSA_Mi.... Accessed 12 December 2013.
    1. Al-Tawfiq JA, Assiri A, Memish ZA. Middle East respiratory syndrome novel corona MERS-CoV infection. Epidemiology and outcome update. Saudi Med J. 2013;34:991–4. - PubMed
    1. Saudi Ministry of Health—novel coronavirus - media statements. Available at: http://www.moh.gov.sa/en/CoronaNew/PressReleases/Pages/default.aspx . Accessed 20 November 2013.