Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2014 Jul;78(1):94-105.
doi: 10.1111/bcp.12324.

Population pharmacokinetics of levodopa in subjects with advanced Parkinson's disease: levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel infusion vs. oral tablets

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Population pharmacokinetics of levodopa in subjects with advanced Parkinson's disease: levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel infusion vs. oral tablets

Ahmed A Othman et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Aims: Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) provides continuous levodopa-carbidopa delivery through intrajejunal infusion. This study characterized the population pharmacokinetics of levodopa following a 16 h jejunal infusion of LCIG or frequent oral administration of levodopa-carbidopa tablets (LC-oral) in subjects with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD).

Methods: A non-linear mixed-effects model of levodopa pharmacokinetics was developed using serial plasma concentrations from an LCIG phase 1 study and a phase 3 double-blind, double-dummy study of the efficacy and safety of LCIG compared with LC-oral in advanced PD patients (n = 68 for model development; 45 on LCIG and 23 on LC-oral). The final model was internally evaluated using stochastic simulations and bootstrap and externally evaluated using sparse pharmacokinetic data from 311 subjects treated in a long term safety study of LCIG.

Results: The final model was a two compartment model with a transit compartment for absorption, first order elimination, bioavailability for LCIG (97%; confidence interval = 95% to 98%) relative to LC-oral, different first order transit absorption rate constants (LCIG = 9.2 h(-1) vs. LC-oral = 2.4 h(-1) ; corresponding mean absorption time of 7 min for LCIG vs. 25 min for LC-oral) and different residual (intra-subject) variability for LCIG (15% proportional error, 0.3 μg ml(-1) additive error) vs. LC-oral (29% proportional error, 0.59 μg ml(-1) additive error). Estimated oral clearance and steady-state volume of distribution for levodopa were 24.8 l h(-1) and 131 l, respectively.

Conclusions: LCIG administration results in faster absorption, comparable levodopa bioavailability and significantly reduced intra-subject variability in levodopa concentrations relative to LC-oral administration.

Keywords: Duodopa; Parkinson's disease; intestinal gel; levodopa; population pharmacokinetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagnostic plots of the final levodopa pharmacokinetic model. (A) observed vs. population predicted plasma concentration; (B) observed vs. individual predicted plasma concentrations; (C) conditional weighted residuals (CWRES) vs. population predicted concentrations; (D) conditional weighted residuals (CWRES) vs. time. Solid lines represent lines of identity in A and B and zero conditional residuals in C and D. Dashed lines represent ± 3 SD in C and D
Figure 2
Figure 2
Standard visual predictive check stratified by treatment for the final pharmacokinetic model. ○, observed concentration; formula image, observed median; formula image, observed P5 and P95; formula image, 95% CI for simulated median, P5 and P95
Figure 3
Figure 3
Prediction-corrected visual predictive check stratified by treatment for the final pharmacokinetic model. ○, observed; formula image, observed median; formula image, observed P5 and P95; formula image, 95% CI for simulated median, P5 and P95
Figure 4
Figure 4
External evaluation of the predictive performance of the final pharmacokinetic model using study 3. Observed and simulated levodopa concentrations are depicted vs. time. ○, observed concentration;formula image, observed median; formula image, observed 5th and 95th percentiles; formula image, 95% CI for simulated median, 5th and 95th percentiles
Figure 5
Figure 5
Prediction-corrected observed and simulated levodopa concentrations for study 3 vs. time. The typical prediction correction normalizes for the differences in independent variables within a time bin allowing for better visualization of the model predictive performance. ○, observed; formula image, observed median; formula image, observed 5th and 95th percentiles; formula image, 95% CI for simulated median, 5th and 95th percentiles

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nussbaum RL, Ellis CE. Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1356–1364. - PubMed
    1. Hornykiewicz O. Basic research on dopamine in Parkinson's disease and the discovery of the nigrostriatal dopamine pathway: the view of an eyewitness. Neurodegener Dis. 2008;5:114–117. - PubMed
    1. Calne DB, Reid JL, Vakil SD, Rao S, Petrie A, Pallis CA, Gawler J, Thomas PK, Hilson A. Idiopathic Parkinsonism treated with an extracerebral decarboxylase inhibitor in combination with levodopa. Br Med J. 1971;3:729–732. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nutt JG. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of levodopa. Mov Disord. 2008;23(Suppl. 3):S580–584. - PubMed
    1. Agid Y, Ahlskog E, Albanese A, Calne D, Chase T, De Yebenes J, Factor S, Fahn S, Gershanik O, Goetz C, Koller W, Kurth M, Lang A, Lees A, Lewitt P, Marsden D, Melamed E, Michel PP, Mizuno Y, Obeso J, Oertel W, Olanow W, Poewe W, Pollak P, Tolosa E. Levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: a consensus meeting. Mov Disord. 1999;14:911–913. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms