Predicting protein-ligand binding site using support vector machine with protein properties
- PMID: 24407309
- DOI: 10.1109/TCBB.2013.126
Predicting protein-ligand binding site using support vector machine with protein properties
Abstract
Identification of protein-ligand binding site is an important task in structure-based drug design and docking algorithms. In the past two decades, different approaches have been developed to predict the binding site, such as the geometric, energetic, and sequence-based methods. When scores are calculated from these methods, the algorithm for doing classification becomes very important and can affect the prediction results greatly. In this paper, the support vector machine (SVM) is used to cluster the pockets that are most likely to bind ligands with the attributes of geometric characteristics, interaction potential, offset from protein, conservation score, and properties surrounding the pockets. Our approach is compared to LIGSITE, LIGSITE(CSC), SURFNET, Fpocket, PocketFinder, Q-SiteFinder, ConCavity, and MetaPocket on the data set LigASite and 198 drug-target protein complexes. The results show that our approach improves the success rate from 60 to 80 percent at AUC measure and from 61 to 66 percent at top 1 prediction. Our method also provides more comprehensive results than the others.
Similar articles
-
MetaPocket: a meta approach to improve protein ligand binding site prediction.OMICS. 2009 Aug;13(4):325-30. doi: 10.1089/omi.2009.0045. OMICS. 2009. PMID: 19645590
-
Identification of cavities on protein surface using multiple computational approaches for drug binding site prediction.Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 1;27(15):2083-8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr331. Epub 2011 Jun 2. Bioinformatics. 2011. PMID: 21636590
-
Q-SiteFinder: an energy-based method for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites.Bioinformatics. 2005 May 1;21(9):1908-16. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti315. Epub 2005 Feb 8. Bioinformatics. 2005. PMID: 15701681
-
Protein-protein interface analysis and hot spots identification for chemical ligand design.Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20(8):1192-200. doi: 10.2174/13816128113199990065. Curr Pharm Des. 2014. PMID: 23713772 Review.
-
[Development and validation of programs for ligand-binding-pocket search].Yakugaku Zasshi. 2011;131(10):1429-35. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.131.1429. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2011. PMID: 21963969 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
Protein ligand-specific binding residue predictions by an ensemble classifier.BMC Bioinformatics. 2016 Nov 17;17(1):470. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1348-3. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016. PMID: 27855637 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial intelligence in the prediction of protein-ligand interactions: recent advances and future directions.Brief Bioinform. 2022 Jan 17;23(1):bbab476. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbab476. Brief Bioinform. 2022. PMID: 34849575 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites by means of ensemble learning and weighted feature descriptor.J Biol Res (Thessalon). 2016 Jul 4;23(Suppl 1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40709-016-0046-7. eCollection 2016 May. J Biol Res (Thessalon). 2016. PMID: 27437195 Free PMC article.
-
The choice of sequence homologs included in multiple sequence alignments has a dramatic impact on evolutionary conservation analysis.Bioinformatics. 2019 Jan 1;35(1):12-19. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty523. Bioinformatics. 2019. PMID: 29947739 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
