Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul 1;5(2):219.
doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v5i2.4726. eCollection 2013.

A public-private partnership develops and externally validates a 30-day hospital readmission risk prediction model

Affiliations

A public-private partnership develops and externally validates a 30-day hospital readmission risk prediction model

Shahid A Choudhry et al. Online J Public Health Inform. .

Abstract

Introduction: Preventing the occurrence of hospital readmissions is needed to improve quality of care and foster population health across the care continuum. Hospitals are being held accountable for improving transitions of care to avert unnecessary readmissions. Advocate Health Care in Chicago and Cerner (ACC) collaborated to develop all-cause, 30-day hospital readmission risk prediction models to identify patients that need interventional resources. Ideally, prediction models should encompass several qualities: they should have high predictive ability; use reliable and clinically relevant data; use vigorous performance metrics to assess the models; be validated in populations where they are applied; and be scalable in heterogeneous populations. However, a systematic review of prediction models for hospital readmission risk determined that most performed poorly (average C-statistic of 0.66) and efforts to improve their performance are needed for widespread usage.

Methods: The ACC team incorporated electronic health record data, utilized a mixed-method approach to evaluate risk factors, and externally validated their prediction models for generalizability. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied on the patient cohort and then split for derivation and internal validation. Stepwise logistic regression was performed to develop two predictive models: one for admission and one for discharge. The prediction models were assessed for discrimination ability, calibration, overall performance, and then externally validated.

Results: The ACC Admission and Discharge Models demonstrated modest discrimination ability during derivation, internal and external validation post-recalibration (C-statistic of 0.76 and 0.78, respectively), and reasonable model fit during external validation for utility in heterogeneous populations.

Conclusions: The ACC Admission and Discharge Models embody the design qualities of ideal prediction models. The ACC plans to continue its partnership to further improve and develop valuable clinical models.

Keywords: 30-day All-Cause Hospital Readmission; Clinical Decision Prediction Model; Derivation and External Validation of a Prediction Model; Prediction Model; Predictive Analytics; Readmission Risk Stratification Tool.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Geographic Location of 8 Advocate Health Care Hospitals
Figure 2
Figure 2
ACC Readmission Risk Prediction Conceptual Model
Figure 3
Figure 3
Multiple Readmission Sampling Methodology
Figure 4
Figure 4
ROC Curves for ACC Admission & Discharge Model

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA. 2009. Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program. N Engl J Med. 360(14), 1418-28 10.1056/NEJMsa0803563 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hackbarth AD,, Berwick DM. 2012. Eliminating waste in US health care. JAMA. 307(14), 1513-16 10.1001/jama.2012.362 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boutwell A, Jencks S, Nielsen G, et al. State Action on Avoidable Rehospitalizations (STAAR) Initiative: Applying early evidence and experience in front-line process improvements to develop a state based strategy. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2009 May 1[cited 2013 Apr 15]. Available from: http://www.ihi.org/offerings/Initiatives/STAAR/Documents/STAAR%20State%2...
    1. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC). Washington, DC: Report to the Congress: Reforming the Delivery System; 2008 June 13 [cited 2013 April 22]. Available from: http://www.medpac.gov/documents/jun08_entirereport.pdf
    1. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. L. No. 111-148, §2702, 124 Stat. 119, 318-319 (March 23, 2010).

LinkOut - more resources