Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1986 Mar;49(3):629-43.
doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(86)83690-6.

Saxitoxin and tetrodotoxin. Electrostatic effects on sodium channel gating current in crayfish axons

Saxitoxin and tetrodotoxin. Electrostatic effects on sodium channel gating current in crayfish axons

S T Heggeness et al. Biophys J. 1986 Mar.

Abstract

The effects of extracellular saxitoxin (STX) and tetrodotoxin (TTX) on gating current (IgON) were studied in voltage clamped crayfish giant axons. At a holding potential (VH) of -90 mV, integrated gating charge (QON) was found to be 56% suppressed when 200 nM STX was added to the external solution, and 75% suppressed following the addition of 200 nM TTX. These concentrations of toxin are sufficiently high to block greater than 99% of sodium channels. A smaller suppression of IgON was observed when 1 nM STX was used (KD = 1-2 nM STX). The suppression of IgON by external toxin was found to be hold potential dependent, with only minimal suppression observed at the most hyperpolarized hold potentials, -140 to -120 mV. The maximal effect of these toxins on IgON was observed at hold potentials where the QON vs. VH plot was found to be steepest, -100 to -80 mV. The suppression of IgON induced by TTX is partially relieved following the removal of fast inactivation by intracellular treatment with N-bromoacetamide (NBA). The effect of STX and TTX on IgON is equivalent to a hyperpolarizing shift in the steady state inactivation curve, with 200 nM STX and 200 nM TTX inducing shifts of 4.9 +/- 1.7 mV and 10.0 +/- 2.1 mV, respectively. Our results are consistent with a model where the binding of toxin displaces a divalent cation from a negatively charged site near the external opening of the sodium channel, thereby producing a voltage offset sensed by the channel gating apparatus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Membr Biol. 1978 Jan 18;38(3):271-89 - PubMed
    1. J Gen Physiol. 1975 Jul;66(1):47-65 - PubMed
    1. Biophys J. 1983 Mar;41(3):269-74 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1975 Jul;248(3):613-24 - PubMed
    1. J Gen Physiol. 1969 Nov;54(5):589-606 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources