Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov 19;110(47):E4474-81.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319063110. Epub 2013 Nov 4.

Drosophila switch gene Sex-lethal can bypass its switch-gene target transformer to regulate aspects of female behavior

Daniel S Evans  1 , Thomas W Cline
Affiliations

Drosophila switch gene Sex-lethal can bypass its switch-gene target transformer to regulate aspects of female behavior

Daniel S Evans et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

The switch gene Sex-lethal (Sxl) was thought to elicit all aspects of Drosophila female somatic differentiation other than size dimorphism by controlling only the switch gene transformer (tra). Here we show instead that Sxl controls an aspect of female sexual behavior by acting on a target other than or in addition to tra. We inferred the existence of this unknown Sxl target from the observation that a constitutively feminizing tra transgene that restores fertility to tra(-) females failed to restore fertility to Sxl-mutant females that were adult viable but functionally tra(-). The sterility of these mutant females was caused by an ovulation failure. Because tra expression is not sufficient to render these Sxl-mutant females fertile, we refer to this pathway as the tra-insufficient feminization (TIF) branch of the sex-determination regulatory pathway. Using a transgene that conditionally expresses two Sxl feminizing isoforms, we find that the TIF branch is required developmentally for neurons that also sex-specifically express fruitless, a tra gene target controlling sexual behavior. Thus, in a subset of fruitless neurons, targets of the TIF and tra pathways appear to collaborate to control ovulation. In most insects, Sxl has no sex-specific functions, and tra, rather than Sxl, is both the target of the primary sex signal and the gene that maintains the female developmental commitment via positive autoregulation. The TIF pathway may represent an ancestral female-specific function acquired by Sxl in an early evolutionary step toward its becoming the regulator of tra in Drosophila.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Lesions in partial-loss-of-function alleles that are central to the present study: Sxlf7,M1, SxlM1,fΔ33, and Sxlf18,f32. Putative translation starts (AUG) and stops (S) are indicated in the context of the establishment promoter (Pe) that transiently responds very early to the primary sex-determination signal, the maintenance promoter (Pm) that operates thereafter, and the various exons, among which are the male-specific translation-terminating exon 3, which is responsible for the gene's sex-specific functioning, and exons 9 and 10 that encode alternative C-terminal isoforms important for germ-line but not somatic functioning. The two RNA-binding domains (RRM) are shown, as is the location of a proline-rich domain (black line) essential for germ-line activity that is just proximal to the site of alternative splicing out of exon 8 that is blocked in the female-sterile allele, Sxlf18. M1 is a transposon insertion that, by itself, leads to semiconstitutive feminizing expression of Sxl and hence dominant, male-specific lethality. Sxlf7,M1 and SxlM1,fΔ33 were selected for suppression of that male-specific lethality, and Sxlf18,f32 was selected for suppression of Sxlf18 sterility. SxlfΔ33 is an intragenic deletion that interferes only partially with female functioning, whereas P{SxlΔPm} is a duplication of the entire gene minus the Pm region. It provides wild-type Pe function but nothing more. Details regarding mutations that are not referenced in the text are given in Materials and Methods.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
A powerful genetic screen used to generate a constitutively feminizing tra allele for a test of the TIF/TSF distinction and to explore the basis for cis-dominant suppression of Sxlf18 sterility by Sxlf32. Among 300,000 somatically masculinized chromosomal daughters (Ψ males) from mutagenized fathers that were screened, one mosaic and one nonmosaic phenotypic female were recovered. Because only Ψ males normally survive this screen, rare phenotypic females arising by either intergenic or intragenic suppression were obvious. Dominant temperature-sensitive–lethal balancers (whose derivation is described in Materials and Methods) were used in conjunction with the recessive temperature-sensitive–lethal shibirets to facilitate generation of the large numbers of parents needed and to eliminate the superfluous classes of progeny.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Possible origin of the TIF-pathway branch in the current Drosophila sex-determination regulatory gene pathway from a time when tra was the master autoregulating sex-determination gene with Sxl under its sex-specific control. (A) It is proposed that an early step in the switch from tra to Sxl as the positively autoregulating target of the female sex-determination signal was the acquisition by Sxl of a gene target with a female-specific function, with Sxl then becoming a regulatory target of tra. (B) Siera and Cline (13) suggested that redundancy in positive feedbacks involving tra and Sxl might have led to the present-day regulatory arrangement with tra downstream rather than upstream of Sxl. After the switch from A to B, female-specific targets of Sxl that originally were part of the TSF pathway would stand out as part of a TIF pathway. (C) Redrawing of B that presents the same regulatory relationships in a more conventional way.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Bridges CB. Non-disjunction as proof of the chromosome theory of heredity. Genetics. 1916;1(1):1–52. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schütt C, Nöthiger R. Structure, function and evolution of sex-determining systems in Dipteran insects. Development. 2000;127(4):667–677. - PubMed
    1. Casper A, Van Doren M. The control of sexual identity in the Drosophila germline. Development. 2006;133(15):2783–2791. - PubMed
    1. Camara N, Whitworth C, Van Doren M. The creation of sexual dimorphism in the Drosophila soma. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2008;83:65–107. - PubMed
    1. Villella A, Hall JC. Neurogenetics of courtship and mating in Drosophila. Adv Genet. 2008;62:67–184. - PubMed

Publication types