Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun;5(2):025004.
doi: 10.1088/1758-5082/5/2/025004. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

Characterization of printable cellular micro-fluidic channels for tissue engineering

Yahui Zhang  1 , Yin Yu, Howard Chen, Ibrahim T Ozbolat
Affiliations

Characterization of printable cellular micro-fluidic channels for tissue engineering

Yahui Zhang et al. Biofabrication. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

Tissue engineering has been a promising field of research, offering hope of bridging the gap between organ shortage and transplantation needs. However, building three-dimensional (3D) vascularized organs remains the main technological barrier to be overcome. One of the major challenges is the inclusion of a vascular network to support cell viability in terms of nutrients and oxygen perfusion. This paper introduces a new approach to the fabrication of vessel-like microfluidic channels that has the potential to be used in thick tissue or organ fabrication in the future. In this research, we investigate the manufacturability of printable micro-fluidic channels, where micro-fluidic channels support mechanical integrity as well as enable fluid transport in 3D. A pressure-assisted solid freeform fabrication platform is developed with a coaxial needle dispenser unit to print hollow hydrogel filaments. The dispensing rheology is studied, and effects of material properties on structural formation of hollow filaments are analyzed. Sample structures are printed through the developed computer-controlled system. In addition, cell viability and gene expression studies are presented in this paper. Cell viability shows that cartilage progenitor cells (CPCs) maintained their viability right after bioprinting and during prolonged in vitro culture. Real-time PCR analysis yielded a relatively higher expression of cartilage-specific genes in alginate hollow filament encapsulating CPCs, compared with monolayer cultured CPCs, which revealed that printable semi-permeable micro-fluidic channels provided an ideal environment for cell growth and function.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The experimental setup: (a) 3D model of the coaxial nozzle, (b) cross-sectional view of coaxial nozzle assembly model with fluid flow paths for hydrogel and crosslinker solutions, (c) the coaxial nozzle system, and (d) the robotic printer platform.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of hydrogel properties on gelation of hollow filaments.
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Effect of CaCl2 and (b) alginate concentration on hollow filament dimensions. (Single asterisk (*) indicates significant differences between groups (p<0.05))
Figure 4
Figure 4. Hollow filament dimensions with different (a) CaCl2 dispensing rates and (b) alginate dispensing rates, and core-to-filament ratio with different relative speed between crosslinker and alginate flow. (Single asterisk (*) indicates significant differences between groups (p<0.05))
Figure 5
Figure 5
Sample printed structures: (a) a printed filament allowing media transport shown with a yellow food dye, (b) an image of a single filament analyzed under a digital microscope, (c) a printed single-layer micro-fluidic channel, and (d) a printed 8-layer micro-fluidic channels.
Figure 6
Figure 6
(a) Perfusion of oxygenized cell type media, (b) media flow with intentionally generated air bubbles showing flow, and (c) embedding microfluidic channels within multilayer bulk hydrogel.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Multi-scale uniaxial tensile testing of hollow filaments: (a) meso-scale analysis illustrating overall deformation on a 2 cm long filament and (b) micro-scale analysis along the cross-section, and the effect of (c) alginate and (d) crosslinker concentrations on tensile deformation of printed micro-fluidic channels and (e)-(f) corresponding modulus of elasticity values obtained from the literature [16].
Figure 8
Figure 8
Laser confocal imaging of viability staining. CPCs labeled with calcein AM and ethidium homodimer after cell encapsulation in an alginate hollow filament (cell viability assay) and imaged with confocal laser scanning microscope. Live and dead cells were fluorescent green and fluorescent red, respectively. (a-b) No dead cells were visible in Day 1 and Day 4 images and (c) a few dead cells were observed in the Day 7 image
Figure 9
Figure 9
Time course of CPC viability after the bioprinting process. Cell viability was analyzed using Image J. Each symbol represents the average of the results for three z-projections composed of six planes from confocal laser imaging. The error bars indicate standard deviations (n=3).
Figure 10
Figure 10
Confocal images showing hollow property of filaments: (a-f) z-projection from top to center of a cell-encapsulated hollow filament, with 50 μm intervals showing the solid wall of fabricated filaments and the hollow channel in the center.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Real-time PCR showed relatively higher expression of cartilage-specific marker PRG-4, Sox-9, COL-2: all showed over two-fold up-regulation in alginate hollow filament encapsulating CPCs after bioprinting, compared with CPCs in monolayer culture. ACAN showed over 12-fold higher expression level. The error bars indicate standard deviations (n=3). (Single asterisk (*) and double asterisks (**) represent significant differences, P<0.05 and P<0.01, from the monolayer control group, respectively.)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Lanza R, Langer R, Vacanti J. Principles of Tissue Engineering. 3. Elsevier; 2007.
    1. Melchels FPW, Domingos MAN, Klein TJ, Malda J, Bartolo PJ, Hutmacher DW. Additive manufacturing of tissues and organs. Progress in Polymer Science. 2012;37:1079–1104.
    1. Mondy WL, Cameron D, Timmermans JP, Clerk ND, Sasov A, Casteleyn C, Piegl L. 2009 Computer-aided design of microvasculature systems for use in vascular scaffold production. 2009;1:035002. - PubMed
    1. Norotte C, Marga FS, Niklason LE, Forgacs G. Scaffold-free vascular tissue engineering using bioprinting. Biomaterials. 2009;30:5910–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee W, Lee V, Polio S, Keegan P, Lee JH, Fischer K, Park JK, Yoo SS. On-demand three-dimensional freeform fabrication of multi-layered hydrogel scaffold with fluidic channels. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 2010;105:1178–1186. - PubMed

Publication types