Human Acellular Dermis versus Submuscular Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Multivariate Analysis of Short-Term Complications
- PMID: 23362476
- PMCID: PMC3556529
- DOI: 10.5999/aps.2013.40.1.19
Human Acellular Dermis versus Submuscular Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Multivariate Analysis of Short-Term Complications
Abstract
Background: Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) allografts and their putative benefits have been increasingly described in prosthesis based breast reconstruction. There have been a myriad of analyses outlining ADM complication profiles, but few large-scale, multi-institutional studies exploring these outcomes. In this study, complication rates of acellular dermis-assisted tissue expander breast reconstruction were compared with traditional submuscular methods by evaluation of the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) registry.
Methods: Patients who underwent immediate tissue expander breast reconstruction from 2006-2010 were identified using surgical procedure codes. Two hundred forty tracked variables from over 250 participating sites were extracted for patients undergoing acellular dermis-assisted versus submuscular tissue expander reconstruction. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes and captured risk factors for complications were compared between the two groups.
Results: A total of 9,159 patients underwent tissue expander breast reconstruction; 1,717 using acellular dermis and 7,442 with submuscular expander placement. Total complications and reconstruction related complications were similar in both cohorts (5.5% vs. 5.3%, P=0.68 and 4.7% vs. 4.3%, P=0.39, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression revealed body mass index and smoking as independent risk factors for reconstructive complications in both cohorts (P<0.01).
Conclusions: The NSQIP database provides large-scale, multi-institutional, independent outcomes for acellular dermis and submuscular breast reconstruction. Both thirty-day complication profiles and risk factors for post operative morbidity are similar between these two reconstructive approaches.
Keywords: Alloderm; Breast implantation; Complications; Mammaplasty; Tissue expansion devices.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A meta-analysis of human acellular dermis and submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jan;129(1):28-41. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182361fd6. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012. PMID: 22186498
-
Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: a head-to-head comparison of outcomes.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Dec;124(6):1735-1740. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181bf803d. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009. PMID: 19952627
-
Comparison study of two types of expander-based breast reconstruction: acellular dermal matrix-assisted versus total submuscular placement.Ann Plast Surg. 2013 Jan;70(1):10-5. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31822f6765. Ann Plast Surg. 2013. PMID: 21862915
-
Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction: a systematic and critical review of efficacy and associated morbidity.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Dec;128(6):1162-1169. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318230c29e. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011. PMID: 22094735 Review.
-
The cost effectiveness of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant immediate breast reconstruction.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Apr;67(4):468-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.12.035. Epub 2014 Jan 23. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014. PMID: 24508194 Review.
Cited by
-
A Complication Analysis of 2 Acellular Dermal Matrices in Prosthetic-based Breast Reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Jul 13;4(7):e800. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000790. eCollection 2016 Jul. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016. PMID: 27536479 Free PMC article.
-
Muscle-Sparing ADM-Assisted Breast Reconstruction Technique Using Complete Breast Implant Coverage: A Dual-Institute UK-Based Experience.Breast Care (Basel). 2017 Sep;12(4):251-254. doi: 10.1159/000464401. Epub 2017 Aug 29. Breast Care (Basel). 2017. PMID: 29070989 Free PMC article.
-
Direct Hospital Cost of Outcome Pathways in Implant-Based Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrices.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Aug 9;4(8):e831. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000848. eCollection 2016 Aug. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016. PMID: 27622099 Free PMC article.
-
Should Acellular Dermal Matrices Be Used for Implant-based Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy? Clinical Recommendation Based on the GRADE Approach.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Feb 22;11(2):e4821. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004821. eCollection 2023 Feb. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023. PMID: 36845868 Free PMC article.
-
Improving Outcome in Immediate Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction, an Algorithm for Operative Decision Making.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Oct 2;6(10):e1845. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001845. eCollection 2018 Oct. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018. PMID: 30534479 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wainwright DJ. Use of an acellular allograft dermal matrix (AlloDerm) in the management of full-thickness burns. Burns. 1995;21:243–248. - PubMed
-
- Kim JY, Bullocks JM, Basu CB, et al. Dermal composite flaps reconstructed from acellular dermis: a novel method of neourethral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:96e–100e. - PubMed
-
- Buinewicz B, Rosen B. Acellular cadaveric dermis (AlloDerm): a new alternative for abdominal hernia repair. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;52:188–194. - PubMed
-
- Nahabedian MY. AlloDerm performance in the setting of prosthetic breast surgery, infection, and irradiation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1743–1753. - PubMed
-
- Buck DW, 2nd, Heyer K, DiBardino D, et al. Acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction with the use of crescentric tissue expansion: a functional cosmetic analysis of 40 consecutive patients. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;30:194–200. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources