Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec 20;492(7429):443-7.
doi: 10.1038/nature11709. Epub 2012 Nov 14.

Tet1 controls meiosis by regulating meiotic gene expression

Shinpei Yamaguchi  1 , Kwonho Hong, Rui Liu, Li Shen, Azusa Inoue, Dinh Diep, Kun Zhang, Yi Zhang
Affiliations

Tet1 controls meiosis by regulating meiotic gene expression

Shinpei Yamaguchi et al. Nature. .

Abstract

Meiosis is a germ-cell-specific cell division process through which haploid gametes are produced for sexual reproduction. Before the initiation of meiosis, mouse primordial germ cells undergo a series of epigenetic reprogramming steps, including the global erasure of DNA methylation at the 5-position of cytosine (5mC) in CpG-rich DNA. Although several epigenetic regulators, such as Dnmt3l and the histone methyltransferases G9a and Prdm9, have been reported to be crucial for meiosis, little is known about how the expression of meiotic genes is regulated and how their expression contributes to normal meiosis. Using a loss-of-function approach in mice, here we show that the 5mC-specific dioxygenase Tet1 has an important role in regulating meiosis in mouse oocytes. Tet1 deficiency significantly reduces female germ-cell numbers and fertility. Univalent chromosomes and unresolved DNA double-strand breaks are also observed in Tet1-deficient oocytes. Tet1 deficiency does not greatly affect the genome-wide demethylation that takes place in primordial germ cells, but leads to defective DNA demethylation and decreased expression of a subset of meiotic genes. Our study thus establishes a function for Tet1 in meiosis and meiotic gene activation in female germ cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Subfertility of Tet1Gt/Gt mice is associated with oocyte loss in late embryonic stage
(a) Abnormal ovaries of the Tet1Gt/Gt mice. Top panel, representative images of ovaries from 8-week-old wild-type (Wt) and Tet1 mutant (Gt/Gt) mice. Both left and right ovaries from one representative female are shown. Bottom panel, representative images of Hematoxylin and Eosin staining of adult ovary sections. Arrows indicate fully-grown oocytes. (b) Number of fully-grown oocytes in adult ovaries. n=4 or 5. Error bars indicate SEM. **P<0.01. (c) The average number of ovulated oocytes per female after hormonal stimulation. n=5–7. Error bars indicate SEM. *P<0.05. (d) The relative oocyte numbers normalized to that in the wild-type (Wt) mouse. The number of oocytes in Wt mice was counted and set as 1. n=2–7. Error bars indicate SEM. *P<0.05, **P<0.01.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Meiotic defects in Tet1Gt/Gt oocytes
(a) Distribution of E16.5, E17.5 and E18.5 oocytes in the four substages of meiotic prophase. Error bars indicate SEM. n=2–5. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, compared between +/Gt and Gt/Gt. (b) Left, representative images of zygotene oocytes co-stained with SYCP3, SYCP1, and CREST antibodies. Right, percentage of the AE-alignment impaired oocytes at the zygotene stage. Oocytes that contain less than five SYCP1-foci are counted as AE-alignment impaired. n=6–8. Error bars indicate SEM. **P<0.01. (c) Left, representative images of pachytene stage oocytes co-stained with SYCP3, SYCP1, and CREST antibodies. Right, distribution of oocyte types categorized by the numbers of univalent chromosomes in each pachytene stage oocyte. n=6–7. Error bars indicate SEM. *P<0.05. **P<0.01. (d) Representative images of oocytes co-stained with antibodies against γH2AX, SYCP3, and CREST (pachytene stage), or γH2AX, SYCP3, and MLH1 (early diplotene stage). (e) Distribution of oocyte types categorized by the staining pattern of γH2AX in each pachytene and early diplotene stage oocyte. Representative images for each group are shown in supplementary figure 9. n=3–7. Error bars indicate SEM. **P<0.01, compared to control.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Tet1 activates meiotic genes through DNA demethylation
(a) Scatter plot comparing transcriptome of wild-type and Tet1Gt/Gt E13.5 female PGCs. There are 111 and 899 genes that are respectively up- or down-regulated (FDR<0.05). Examples of down-regulated meiotic genes include Mael, Sycp3, Stra8, Sycp1, and Prdm9 indicated. (b) Gene ontology analysis of down-regulated genes in Tet1Gt/Gt PGCs with cutoff FDR<0.05. The most enriched biological processes based on their p-values are shown. (c) ChIP-qPCR analysis of E13.5 wild-type female PGCs using anti-Tet1 antibody demonstrates binding of Tet1 to the promoters of Sycp1, Mael, and Sycp3. Upper panels, diagrams of Sycp1, Mael, and Sycp3 genes with the analyzed regions indicated by red lines. Bottom panels, relative enrichment of Tet1 over IgG control. n=3. Error bars indicate SEM. *P<0.05. **P<0.01.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Whole genome bisulfite analysis of the effect of Tet1 knockout on DNA methylation in PGCs
(a) Wt E13.5 female PGCs are globally hypomethylated and depletion of Tet1 only slightly increased the global DNA methylation level. Shown are the DNA methylation levels in the entire mouse genome as well as the various genomic regions. In the last column, the DNA methylation levels at the Tet1 bound regions identified in mES cells were compared. (b) Heat map of the 255 differentially expressed and DMR associated genes. (c) Bisulfite sequencing analysis of the Sycp1, Mael, and Sycp3 gene promoters of Tet1 binding site in wild-type and Tet1Gt/Gt PGCs. Each CpG is represented by a circle. Open and filled circles represent unmethylated or methylated, respectively. Percentages of DNA methylation are indicated.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

  • Epigenetics: Erase for a new start.
    Guibert S, Weber M. Guibert S, et al. Nature. 2012 Dec 20;492(7429):363-4. doi: 10.1038/492363a. Nature. 2012. PMID: 23257876 No abstract available.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Handel MA, Schimenti JC. Genetics of mammalian meiosis: regulation, dynamics and impact on fertility. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2010;11:124–136. - PubMed
    1. Hayashi K, Surani MA. Resetting the epigenome beyond pluripotency in the germline. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;4:493–498. - PubMed
    1. Sasaki H, Matsui Y. Epigenetic events in mammalian germ-cell development: reprogramming and beyond. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;2008:129–140. - PubMed
    1. Hajkova P, et al. Epigenetic reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells. Mech Dev. 2002;117:15–23. - PubMed
    1. Seki Y, et al. Extensive and orderly reprogramming of genome-wide chromatin modifications associated with specification and early development of germ cells in mice. Dev Biol. 2005;278:440–458. - PubMed

References for Methods

    1. Markoulaki S, Meissner A, Jaenisch R. Somatic cell nuclear transfer and derivation of embryonic stem cells in the mouse. Methods (San Diego, Calif.) 2008;45:101–114. - PubMed
    1. Soper SFC, et al. Mouse maelstrom, a component of nuage, is essential for spermatogenesis and transposon repression in meiosis. Developmental Cell. 2008;15:285–297. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kouznetsova A, Novak I, Jessberger R, Hoog C. SYCP2 and SYCP3 are required for cohesin core integrity at diplotene but not for centromere cohesion at the first meiotic division. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:2271–2278. - PubMed
    1. Diep D, et al. Library-free methylation sequencing with bisulfite padlock probes. Nat Methods. 2012;9:270–272. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data