Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;97(1):36-41.
doi: 10.1002/bdra.23094. Epub 2012 Nov 2.

Testing the feasibility of a National Spina Bifida Patient Registry

Affiliations

Testing the feasibility of a National Spina Bifida Patient Registry

Judy K Thibadeau et al. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to describe the development and early implementation of a national spina bifida (SB) patient registry, the goal of which is to monitor the health status, clinical care, and outcomes of people with SB by collecting and analyzing patient data from comprehensive SB clinics.

Methods: Using a web-based, SB-specific electronic medical record, 10 SB clinics collected health-related information for patients diagnosed with myelomeningocele, lipomyelomeningocele, fatty filum, or meningocele. This information was compiled and de-identified for transmission to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for quality control and analysis.

Results: A total of 2070 patients were enrolled from 2009 through 2011: 84.9% were younger than 18 years of age; 1095 were women; 64.2% were non-Hispanic white; 6.5% were non-Hispanic black or African American; and 24.2% were Hispanic or Latino. Myelomeningocele was the most common diagnosis (81.5%).

Conclusions: The creation of a National Spina Bifida Patient Registry partnership between the CDC and SB clinics has been feasible. Through planned longitudinal data collection and the inclusion of additional clinics, the data generated by the registry will become more robust and representative of the population of patients attending SB clinics in the United States and will allow for the investigation of patient outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Geographic distribution of multidisciplinary clinics in the National Spina Bifida Registry project, 2011.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arts DG, De Keizer NF, Scheffer GJ. Defining and improving data quality in medical registries: a literature review, case study, and generic framework. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9:600–611. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bowman RM, McLone DG, Grant JA, et al. Spina bifida outcome: a 25-year prospective. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2001;34:114–120. - PubMed
    1. Byrne BJ, Kishnani PS, Case LE, et al. Pompe disease: design, methodology, and early findings from the Pompe Registry. Mol Genet Metab. 2011;103:1–11. - PubMed
    1. Dillon CM, Davis BE, Duguay S, et al. Longevity of patients born with myelomeningocele. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2000;10(Suppl 1):33–34. - PubMed
    1. Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA, editors. Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: a user’s guide. 2nd ed. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2010. Sep, (Prepared by Outcome DEcIDE Center [Outcome Sciences, Inc. d/b/a Outcome] under Contract No. HHSA29020050035I TO3.) AHRQ Publication No. 10-EHC049. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts