Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 May-Jun;47(5):e50-4.
doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182688d2f.

Use of administrative claims data for identifying patients with cirrhosis

Affiliations

Use of administrative claims data for identifying patients with cirrhosis

Mahendra S Nehra et al. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013 May-Jun.

Abstract

Background: Administrative data are used in clinical research, but the validity of ICD-9 codes to identify cirrhotic patients has not been well established.

Goals: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of ICD-9 codes for cirrhosis in clinical practice.

Study: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients from a safety-net hospital between 2008 and 2011. Patients were initially identified using ICD-9 codes for cirrhosis or a resultant complication. The gold-standard for diagnosis of cirrhosis was histology and/or imaging based on medical record review. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values for each ICD-9 code were calculated. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by the c-statistic using receiver operator characteristic curve analysis.

Results: We identified 2893 patients with an ICD-9 code for cirrhosis, of whom 50.2% had 1 ICD-9 code, 20.3% had 2 different codes, and 29.5% had 3 or more codes. Cirrhosis was confirmed in 44.0% of patients with 1 ICD-9 code, 82.6% with 2 codes, and 95.7% of those with at least 3 codes. Ascites had a significantly lower positive predictive values for cirrhosis than other ICD-9 codes (P<0.001). The optimal combination of ICD-9 codes to identify cirrhotic patients included all codes except that of ascites, with a c-statistic of 0.71 in our derivation cohort. The sensitivity of this combination was confirmed to be 98% in a validation cohort of 285 patients with known cirrhosis.

Conclusions: Administrative data can identify patients with cirrhosis with high accuracy, although ascites has a significantly lower positive predictive value than other ICD-9 codes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver operating characteristic curve for a combination of ICD-9 codes to identify cirrhosis

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kanwal F, Gralnek IM, Hays RD, et al. Health-related quality of life predicts mortality in patients with advanced chronic liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Jul;7(7):793–799. - PubMed
    1. Davis GL, Albright JE, Cook SF, Rosenberg DM. Projecting future complications of chronic hepatitis C in the United States. Liver Transpl. 2003 Apr;9(4):331–338. - PubMed
    1. Kanwal F, Hoang T, Kramer JR, et al. Increasing prevalence of HCC and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Gastroenterology. 2011 Apr;140(4):1182–1188. e1181. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benesch C, Witter DM, Jr., Wilder AL, Duncan PW, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. Inaccuracy of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9-CM) in identifying the diagnosis of ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Neurology. 1997 Sep;49(3):660–664. - PubMed
    1. Marcus P, Braman SS. International classification of disease coding for obstructive lung disease: does it reflect appropriate clinical documentation? Chest. 2010 Jul;138(1):188–192. - PubMed

Publication types