Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Oct 25;490(7421):556-60.
doi: 10.1038/nature11503. Epub 2012 Sep 30.

Structure-based prediction of protein-protein interactions on a genome-wide scale

Qiangfeng Cliff Zhang  1 , Donald Petrey, Lei Deng, Li Qiang, Yu Shi, Chan Aye Thu, Brygida Bisikirska, Celine Lefebvre, Domenico Accili, Tony Hunter, Tom Maniatis, Andrea Califano, Barry Honig
Affiliations

Structure-based prediction of protein-protein interactions on a genome-wide scale

Qiangfeng Cliff Zhang et al. Nature. .

Erratum in

  • Nature. 2013 Mar 7;495(7439):127

Abstract

The genome-wide identification of pairs of interacting proteins is an important step in the elucidation of cell regulatory mechanisms. Much of our present knowledge derives from high-throughput techniques such as the yeast two-hybrid assay and affinity purification, as well as from manual curation of experiments on individual systems. A variety of computational approaches based, for example, on sequence homology, gene co-expression and phylogenetic profiles, have also been developed for the genome-wide inference of protein-protein interactions (PPIs). Yet comparative studies suggest that the development of accurate and complete repertoires of PPIs is still in its early stages. Here we show that three-dimensional structural information can be used to predict PPIs with an accuracy and coverage that are superior to predictions based on non-structural evidence. Moreover, an algorithm, termed PrePPI, which combines structural information with other functional clues, is comparable in accuracy to high-throughput experiments, yielding over 30,000 high-confidence interactions for yeast and over 300,000 for human. Experimental tests of a number of predictions demonstrate the ability of the PrePPI algorithm to identify unexpected PPIs of considerable biological interest. The surprising effectiveness of three-dimensional structural information can be attributed to the use of homology models combined with the exploitation of both close and remote geometric relationships between proteins.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints. The authors declare no competing financial interests. Readers are welcome to comment on the online version of this article at www.nature.com/nature.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Predicting protein-protein interactions using PrePPI
Given a pair of query proteins that potentially interact (QA, QB), representative structures for the individual subunits (MA, MB) are taken from the PDB, where available, or from homology model databases. For each subunit we find both close and remote structural neighbors. A “template” for the interaction exists whenever a PDB or PQS structure contains a pair of interacting chains (e.g. NA1-NB3) that are structural neighbors of MA and MB, respectively. A model is constructed by superposing the individual subunits, MA and MB, on their corresponding structural neighbors, NA1 and NB3. We assign five empirical structure-based scores to each interaction model (Figure S1) and then calculate a likelihood for each model to represent a true interaction by combining these scores using a Bayesian Network (Figure S2) trained on the HC and the N interaction reference sets. We finally combine the structure-derived score (SM) with non-structural evidence associated with the query proteins (e.g., co-expression, functional similarity) using a naïve Bayesian classifier.
Figure 2
Figure 2. ROC curve (A) and Venn diagram (B) for PrePPI predictions and high-throughput (HT) experiments for yeast
HT experiments are labeled with the first author of the relevant publication (Table S4). The number of interactions in each set is given after the set label in the Venn diagram.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Models for the PPI formed between (A) PKD1 and PKCε, and (B) EF1δ and VHL using homology models and remote structural relationships
The same template complex of ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2D 3 and ubiquitin (PDB code: 2fuh A and B chain, shown in blue and red respectively) was used in both cases. The structures of the PH domain of PKD1 and the GNE domain of EF1δ (shown in green and purple) are homology models from ModBase; the structure of a C1 domain of PKCε (yellow) is a homology model from SkyBase; the structure of VHL (cyan) is from PDB (1lm8 V chain). In each case, the relevant homology models are structurally superimposed on one of the two templates in the E2-ubiqutin complex.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

  • Predicting PPIs.
    Doerr A. Doerr A. Nat Methods. 2012 Dec;9(12):1139. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2272. Nat Methods. 2012. PMID: 23355983 No abstract available.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Bonetta L. Protein-protein interactions: Interactome under construction. Nature. 2010;468:851–854. - PubMed
    1. Vidal M, Cusick ME, Barabasi AL. Interactome networks and human disease. Cell. 2011;144:986–998. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shoemaker BA, Panchenko AR. Deciphering protein-protein interactions. Part I. Experimental techniques and databases. PLoS Comput Biol. 2007;3:e42. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reguly T, et al. Comprehensive curation and analysis of global interaction networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol. 2006;5:11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shoemaker BA, Panchenko AR. Deciphering protein-protein interactions. Part II. Computational methods to predict protein and domain interaction partners. PLoS Comput Biol. 2007;3:e43. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms