Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Aug;5(8):819-28.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.11.025.

Regression of inflammation in atherosclerosis by the LXR agonist R211945: a noninvasive assessment and comparison with atorvastatin

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Regression of inflammation in atherosclerosis by the LXR agonist R211945: a noninvasive assessment and comparison with atorvastatin

Esad Vucic et al. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to noninvasively detect the anti-inflammatory properties of the novel liver X receptor agonist R211945.

Background: R211945 induces reversal cholesterol transport and modulates inflammation in atherosclerotic plaques. We aimed to characterize with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) and dynamic contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (DCE-CMR) inflammation and neovascularization, respectively, in atherosclerotic plaques with R211945 treatment compared with atorvastatin treatment and a control.

Methods: Twenty-one atherosclerotic New Zealand white rabbits were divided into 3 groups (control, R211945 [3 mg/kg orally], and atorvastatin [3 mg/kg orally] groups). All groups underwent (18)F-FDG-PET/CT and DCE-CMR at baseline and at 1 and 3 months after treatment initiation. Concomitantly, serum metabolic parameters and histology were assessed. For statistical analysis, continuous DCE-CMR and PET/CT outcomes were modeled as linear functions of time by using a linear mixed model, whereas the histological data, animal characteristics data, and nonlinear regression imaging data were analyzed with a 2-tailed Student t test.

Results: (18)F-FDG-PET/CT detected a decrease in mean and maximum standard uptake values (SUV) over time in the R211945 group (both p = 0.001), indicating inflammation regression. The atorvastatin group displayed no significant change (p = 0.371 and p = 0.600, respectively), indicating no progression or regression. The control group demonstrated an increase in SUV (p = 0.01 and p = 0.04, respectively), indicating progression. There was a significant interaction between time and group for mean and maximum SUV (p = 0.0003 and p = 0.0016, respectively) . DCE-CMR detected a trend toward difference (p = 0.06) in the area under the curve in the atorvastatin group, suggesting a decrease in neovascularization. There was no significant interaction between time and group (p = 0.6350 and p = 0.8011, respectively). Macrophage and apolipoprotein B immunoreactivity decreased in the R211945 and atorvastatin groups (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0004, respectively), and R211945 decreased oxidized phospholipid immunoreactivity (p = 0.02).

Conclusions: Noninvasive imaging with (18)F-FDG-PET/CT and DCE-CMR and histological analysis demonstrated significant anti-inflammatory effects of the LXR agonist R211945 compared with atorvastatin. The results suggest a possible role for LXR agonists in the treatment of atherosclerosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study Design
Atherosclerotic New Zealand white rabbits after 4 months of a high cholesterol diet when imaging scans, lipid profiles, and RNA analysis were performed (baseline). Animals were then divided into control, atorvastatin, and R211945 groups. At 5 months (1-month imaging) and at 7 months (3-month imaging), imaging scans, lipid profiles, RNA analysis, and drug pharmacokinetics (PK) determination were performed. After last imaging, all animals were immediately sacrificed and tissue analysis was performed. ABCA1 = ATP-binding cassette transporter A1; DCE-CMR = dynamic contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance; MC-CMR = multicontrast cardiac magnetic resonance; PET/CT = positron emission tomography/computed tomography.
Figure 2
Figure 2. 18F-Flurodeoxyglucose–PET/CT
(A to I) Coronal PET images through the abdominal aorta (white arrowheads) from 1 representative animal per group. (A, D, G) Baseline of all groups (control, atorvastatin, and R211945, respectively). (B, E, H) All groups at 1 month. (C, F, I) All groups at 3 months. Summary showing scatterplots and standard uptake values versus time slopes (bottom). Abbreviations as in Figure 1.
Figure 3
Figure 3. DCE-CMR
(A to I) Single-slice axial T1-weighted CMR with color-coded overlay of the contrast signal at 1 min of the abdominal aorta with insert of the aorta. (A, D, G) All groups at baseline (control, atorvastatin [Atorva], and R211945, respectively). (B, E, H) All groups at 1 month. (C, F, I) All groups at 3 months. Warm colors (orange to red) indicate higher areas under the curve (AUCs); cool colors (green to blue) indicate lower AUCs. Summary showing scatterplots and AUCs versus time slopes (bottom). Abbreviations as in Figure 1.
Figure 4
Figure 4. MC-CMR
Single-slice axial T2-weighted representative CMR with insert of the aorta with T2-, T1-, and proton density weighing (A to I). (A, D, G) All groups at baseline (control, baseline atorvastatin [Atorva], and baseline R211945, respectively). (B, E, H) All groups at 1 month. (C, F, I) All groups at 3 months. Bar graph summary (right). Values are mean ± SD. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Immunohistology
Representative immunohistological images of individual groups of the abdominal aorta at 3 months. Staining (red-brown, red arrowheads) for macrophages (A, E, I), apolipoprotein B (ApoB) (B, F, J), oxidized phospholipids (OxPL) (C, G, K), and smooth muscle actin (SMA) (D, H, L) are shown. Objective magnification: ×10. The lumen is on the right-hand side from the tissue.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Summary Immunohistology
(Left) Macrophages (MAC), ApoB, OxPL, and SMA staining at 3 months in control and atorvastatin- and R211945-treated animals. Inset shows CD-31 staining for neovessels (individual p values between control and treatment group are indicated). (A to C) Representative histological images after CD-31 staining for neovessels: control (A), atorvastatin (B), and R211945 (C). All values are mean ± SD. *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001. n.s. = nonsignificant; control versus treatment groups. Abbreviations as in Figure 5.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dahlöf B. Cardiovascular disease risk factors: epidemiology and risk assessment. Am J Cardiol. 2010;105:3A–9. - PubMed
    1. Steinberg D, Witztum JL. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein and atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30:2311– 6. - PubMed
    1. Tsimikas S, Miller YI. Oxidative modification of lipoproteins: mechanisms, role in inflammation and potential clinical applications in cardiovascular disease. Curr Pharm Des. 2011;17:27–37. - PubMed
    1. Ross R. Atherosclerosis—an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:115–26. - PubMed
    1. Hansson GK. Atherosclerosis—an immune disease: the Anitschkov Lecture 2007. Atherosclerosis. 2009;202:2–10. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms