Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul 31:12:325.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-325.

LOH at 6q and 10q in fractionated circulating DNA of ovarian cancer patients is predictive for tumor cell spread and overall survival

Affiliations

LOH at 6q and 10q in fractionated circulating DNA of ovarian cancer patients is predictive for tumor cell spread and overall survival

Jan Dominik Kuhlmann et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: We recently showed that LOH proximal to M6P/IGF2R locus (D6S1581) in primary ovarian tumors is predictive for the presence of disseminated tumor cells (DTC) in the bone marrow (BM). For therapy-monitoring, it would be highly desirable to establish a blood-based biomarker. Therefore, we quantified circulating DNA (cirDNA) in sera of 63 ovarian cancer patients before surgery and after chemotherapy, measured incidence of LOH at four cancer-relevant chromosomal loci, correlated LOH with tumor cell spread to the BM and evaluated prognostic significance of LOH.

Methods: cirDNA was fractionated into high- and low molecular-weight fraction (HMWF, LMWF) for LOH-profiling, utilizing PCR-based fluorescence microsatellite analysis. BM aspirates were analyzed for DTC by immunocytochemistry using the pan-cytokeratin antibody A45-B/B3.

Results: cirDNA levels in the HMWF before surgery were predictive for residual tumor load (p = 0.017). After chemotherapy, we observed a significant decline of cirDNA in the LMWF (p = 0.0001) but not in the HMWF. LOH was prevalently detected in the LMWF with an overall frequency of 67%, only moderately ablating after chemotherapy (45%). Before surgery, LOH in the LMWF at marker D10S1765 and D13S218 significantly correlated with tumor grading and FIGO stage (p = 0.033, p = 0.004, respectively). In both combined fractions, LOH at D6S1581 additionally associated with overall survival (OS) (p = 0.030). Moreover, solely LOH at D10S1765 in LMWF after therapy correlated with DTC in BM after therapy (p = 0.017).

Conclusion: We demonstrate the applicability and necessity of DNA-fractionation prior to analyzing circulating LOH and identify LOH at D10S1765 and D6S1581 as novel blood-based biomarkers for ovarian cancer, being relevant for therapy-monitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Quantification of fractionated serum DNA derived from ovarian cancer patients. The box plot shows the results of spectrophotometrical quantification of cirDNA in the HMWF and the LMWF derived from blood serum of ovarian cancer patients before surgery and after chemotherapy. Statistical significance according to the Mann–Whitney-U test for the non-parametric comparison of two independent variables is indicated.
Figure 2
Figure 2
LOH incidence in blood serum at ovarian cancer-related chromosomal regions. The bar chart graphically demonstrates the LOH frequencies observed in the HMWF- and LMWF-DNA of blood serum from ovarian cancer patients at four selected microsatellite markers.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Correlation of LOH at D6S1581 and overall survival. Kaplan-Meier curves depict overall survival analysis of patients with and without LOH incidence at marker D6S1581 in a combined analysis of both fractions, before surgery. Top curves, patients with retention of the two alleles at D6S1581. Bottom curves, patients with LOH at marker D6S1581.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Goodman MT, Howe HL, Tung KH, Hotes J, Miller BA, Coughlin SS, Chen VW. Incidence of ovarian cancer by race and ethnicity in the United States, 1992–1997. Cancer. 2003;97(10 Suppl):2676–2685. - PubMed
    1. du Bois A, Quinn M, Thigpen T, Vermorken J, Avall-Lundqvist E, Bookman M, Bowtell D, Brady M, Casado A, Cervantes A. et al.2004 consensus statements on the management of ovarian cancer: final document of the 3rd International Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference (GCIG OCCC 2004) Ann Oncol. 2005;16(Suppl 8):viii7–viii12. - PubMed
    1. du Bois A, Reuss A, Pujade-Lauraine E, Harter P, Ray-Coquard I, Pfisterer J. Role of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a combined exploratory analysis of 3 prospectively randomized phase 3 multicenter trials: by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom (AGO-OVAR) and the Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux Pour les Etudes des Cancers de l'Ovaire (GINECO) Cancer. 2009;115(6):1234–1244. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24149. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martin LP, Schilder RJ. Management of recurrent ovarian carcinoma: current status and future directions. Semin Oncol. 2009;36(2):112–125. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2008.12.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kuhlmann JD, Schwarzenbach H, Otterbach F, Heubner M, Wimberger P, Worm KH, Kimmig R, Kasimir-Bauer S. Loss of heterozygosity proximal to the M6P/IGF2R locus is predictive for the presence of disseminated tumor cells in the bone marrow of ovarian cancer patients before and after chemotherapy. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2011;50(8):598–605. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20882. Epub 2011 May 11. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms