Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;22(1):7-15.
doi: 10.1002/pds.3319. Epub 2012 Jul 3.

Validity of health plan and birth certificate data for pregnancy research

Susan E Andrade  1 , Pamela E Scott, Robert L Davis, De-Kun Li, Darios Getahun, T Craig Cheetham, Marsha A Raebel, Sengwee Toh, Sascha Dublin, Pamala A Pawloski, Tarek A Hammad, Sarah J Beaton, David H Smith, Inna Dashevsky, Katherine Haffenreffer, William O Cooper
Affiliations

Validity of health plan and birth certificate data for pregnancy research

Susan E Andrade et al. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the validity of health plan and birth certificate data for pregnancy research.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using administrative and claims data from 11 U.S. health plans and corresponding birth certificate data from state health departments. Diagnoses, drug dispensings, and procedure codes were used to identify infant outcomes (cardiac defects, anencephaly, preterm birth, and neonatal intensive care unit [NICU] admission) and maternal diagnoses (asthma and systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE]) recorded in the health plan data for live born deliveries between January 2001 and December 2007. A random sample of medical charts (n = 802) was abstracted for infants and mothers identified with the specified outcomes. Information on newborn, maternal, and paternal characteristics (gestational age at birth, birth weight, previous pregnancies and live births, race/ethnicity) was also abstracted and compared to birth certificate data. Positive predictive values (PPVs) were calculated with documentation in the medical chart serving as the gold standard.

Results: PPVs were 71% for cardiac defects, 37% for anencephaly, 87% for preterm birth, and 92% for NICU admission. PPVs for algorithms to identify maternal diagnoses of asthma and SLE were ≥ 93%. Our findings indicated considerable agreement (PPVs > 90%) between birth certificate and medical record data for measures related to birth weight, gestational age, prior obstetrical history, and race/ethnicity.

Conclusions: Health plan and birth certificate data can be useful to accurately identify some infant outcomes, maternal diagnoses, and newborn, maternal, and paternal characteristics. Other outcomes and variables may require medical record review for validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Dublin has received a Merck/New Investigator Award from the American Geriatrics Society for work unrelated to this project. Other co-authors report no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Cooper WO, Hernandez-Diaz S, Ray WA. Positive predictive value of computerized records for major congenital malformations. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008;17:455–460. - PubMed
    1. DiGiuseppe DL, Aron DC, Ranbom L, Harper DL, Rosenthal GE. Reliability of birth certificate data: a multi-hospital comparison to medical records information. Matern Child Health J. 2002;6(3):169–79. - PubMed
    1. Northam S, Knapp TR. The reliability and validity of birth certificates. JOGNN. 2006;35:3–12. - PubMed
    1. Pearl M, Wier ML, Kharrazi M. Assessing the quality of last menstrual period data on California birth records. Paediatric Perinatal Epidemiol. 2007;21(Suppl 2):50–61. - PubMed
    1. Reichman NE, Hade EM. Validation of birth certificate data. A study of women in New Jersey’s HealthStart program. Ann Epidemiol. 2001;11(3):186–93. - PubMed

Publication types