Comparison of different ADM materials in breast surgery
- PMID: 22482358
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2012.02.004
Comparison of different ADM materials in breast surgery
Abstract
This is a brief review of the history of the role of acellular dermal matrices in breast reconstruction surgery, with a summary of several currently available products, including a table of comparisons. Key features, including biologic tissue source, surgical preparation, sterility, polarity, contraindications, shelf life, and cost, are examined. A paucity of data exists to directly compare AlloDerm®, DermaMatrix®, Strattice™, Permacol™, DermACELL, FlexHD®, SurgiMend®, and ALLOMAX™ for breast reconstruction; most studies relate to hernia repair. An ideal acellular dermal matrix product is still unavailable but the information provided in this review should facilitate a breast surgeons decision-making process.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Similar articles
-
A Meta-analysis of Studies Comparing Outcomes of Diverse Acellular Dermal Matrices for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Jul;79(1):115-123. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001085. Ann Plast Surg. 2017. PMID: 28509698 Review.
-
A direct comparison of porcine (Strattice™) and bovine (Surgimend™) acellular dermal matrices in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Aug;70(8):1076-1082. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 May 19. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017. PMID: 28624524
-
A Head to Head Comparison Between SurgiMend® - Fetal Bovine Acellular Dermal Matrix and Tutomesh® - A Bovine Pericardium Collagen Membrane in Breast Reconstruction in 45 Cases.In Vivo. 2017 Jul-Aug;31(4):677-682. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11112. In Vivo. 2017. PMID: 28652438 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective unbiased experience with three acellular dermal matrices in breast reconstruction.J Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep;116(3):365-370. doi: 10.1002/jso.24656. Epub 2017 Apr 25. J Surg Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28444764
-
Acellular dermal matrices in breast surgery: tips and pearls.Clin Plast Surg. 2012 Apr;39(2):177-186. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2012.02.003. Clin Plast Surg. 2012. PMID: 22482359 Review.
Cited by
-
A Complication Analysis of 2 Acellular Dermal Matrices in Prosthetic-based Breast Reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Jul 13;4(7):e800. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000790. eCollection 2016 Jul. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016. PMID: 27536479 Free PMC article.
-
A Histological Comparison of Two Human Acellular Dermal Matrix Products in Prosthetic-Based Breast Reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Dec 27;5(12):e1576. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001576. eCollection 2017 Dec. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017. PMID: 29632762 Free PMC article.
-
Alloplastic adjuncts in breast reconstruction.Gland Surg. 2016 Apr;5(2):158-73. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.06.02. Gland Surg. 2016. PMID: 27047784 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evidence for the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.Semin Plast Surg. 2019 Nov;33(4):229-235. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1696986. Epub 2019 Oct 17. Semin Plast Surg. 2019. PMID: 31632205 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Direct-to-Implant Subcutaneous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Complications and Patient's Quality of Life.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Feb;47(1):92-105. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-03068-2. Epub 2022 Sep 12. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023. PMID: 36097081 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical