Condom effectiveness: where are we now?
- PMID: 22348628
- DOI: 10.1071/SH11036
Condom effectiveness: where are we now?
Abstract
After performing a review of prospective cohort evaluations, a focussed assessment of the current knowledge base and methodology pertaining to condom effectiveness against sexually transmissible infections, including HIV, was also conducted. Key observations included the point that studies of condom effectiveness are inherently complex and the potential forms of study bias all generally favour the null hypothesis. Perhaps the most challenging obstacle to rigor in these studies lies in determining which events of condom-protected sex occurred before infection as opposed to after infection when, in fact, infection occurs. This problem leads to misclassification bias; however, other sources of misclassification bias are common. Greater attention to the selection of a recall period, improved precision of self-reported measures, and accounting for condom use errors and problems are critical steps that must occur to promote rigor in these studies. Despite multiple shortcomings, prospective studies of condom effectiveness provide a reasonably favourable evaluation. Subsequent studies, however, should be designed to greatly reduce the error variance that predisposes condom effectiveness studies to type 2 errors that mask the potential value of condoms.
Similar articles
-
A review of the effectiveness and acceptability of the female condom for dual protection.Sex Health. 2012 Mar;9(1):18-26. doi: 10.1071/SH11037. Sex Health. 2012. PMID: 22348629 Review.
-
Condom use around the globe: how can we fulfil the prevention potential of male condoms?Sex Health. 2012 Mar;9(1):4-9. doi: 10.1071/SH11072. Sex Health. 2012. PMID: 22348627 Review.
-
Condom use: still a sexual health staple.Sex Health. 2012 Mar;9(1):1-3. doi: 10.1071/SH11111. Sex Health. 2012. PMID: 22348626
-
Condom use errors and problems: a global view.Sex Health. 2012 Mar;9(1):81-95. doi: 10.1071/SH11095. Sex Health. 2012. PMID: 22348636 Review.
-
Condom use to prevent sexually transmitted infections: a global perspective.Sex Health. 2012 Mar;9(1):vii. doi: 10.1071/SH11901. Sex Health. 2012. PMID: 22348639 No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Issues Surrounding HIV Status Disclosure: Experiences of Seropositive Women in Lagos, Nigeria.Int J Prev Med. 2017 Aug 31;8:60. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_136_15. eCollection 2017. Int J Prev Med. 2017. PMID: 28966749 Free PMC article.
-
Condom Use Errors and Problems: A Comparative Study of HIV-Positive Versus HIV-Negative Young Black Men Who Have Sex With Men.Sex Transm Dis. 2015 Nov;42(11):634-6. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000356. Sex Transm Dis. 2015. PMID: 26462188 Free PMC article.
-
Examining the evidence on the causal effect of HAART on transmission of HIV using the Bradford Hill criteria.AIDS. 2013 Apr 24;27(7):1159-65. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32835f1d68. AIDS. 2013. PMID: 23902921 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Expert consensus statement on the science of HIV in the context of criminal law.J Int AIDS Soc. 2018 Jul;21(7):e25161. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25161. J Int AIDS Soc. 2018. PMID: 30044059 Free PMC article.
-
Behavioral interventions for improving dual-method contraceptive use.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 30;2014(3):CD010915. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010915.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 24683022 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical