Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May 1;18(9):2534-44.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1407. Epub 2012 Feb 14.

Akt inhibitors MK-2206 and nelfinavir overcome mTOR inhibitor resistance in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Affiliations

Akt inhibitors MK-2206 and nelfinavir overcome mTOR inhibitor resistance in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Adam M Petrich et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: The mTOR pathway is constitutively activated in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). mTOR inhibitors have activity in DLBCL, although response rates remain low. We evaluated DLBCL cell lines with differential resistance to the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin: (i) to identify gene expression profile(s) (GEP) associated with resistance to rapamycin, (ii) to understand mechanisms of rapamycin resistance, and (iii) to identify compounds likely to synergize with mTOR inhibitor.

Experimental design: We sought to identify a GEP of mTOR inhibitor resistance by stratification of eight DLBCL cell lines with respect to response to rapamycin. Then, using pathway analysis and connectivity mapping, we sought targets likely accounting for this resistance and compounds likely to overcome it. We then evaluated two compounds thus identified for their potential to synergize with rapamycin in DLBCL and confirmed mechanisms of activity with standard immunoassays.

Results: We identified a GEP capable of reliably distinguishing rapamycin-resistant from rapamycin-sensitive DLBCL cell lines. Pathway analysis identified Akt as central to the differentially expressed gene network. Connectivity mapping identified compounds targeting Akt as having a high likelihood of reversing the GEP associated with mTOR inhibitor resistance. Nelfinavir and MK-2206, chosen for their Akt-inhibitory properties, yielded synergistic inhibition of cell viability in combination with rapamycin in DLBCL cell lines, and potently inhibited phosphorylation of Akt and downstream targets of activated mTOR.

Conclusions: GEP identifies DLBCL subsets resistant to mTOR inhibitor therapy. Combined targeting of mTOR and Akt suppresses activation of key components of the Akt/mTOR pathway and results in synergistic cytotoxicity. These findings are readily adaptable to clinical trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Gene expression profiling identifies a signature capable of predicting Rapamycin resistance in DLBCL cell lines
A. 106 DLBCL cells/ml were treated with Rapamycin, 5-200nM for 48h. DLBCL cell lines corresponding to the dose/response curves are labeled to the right of the figure, in order of degree of resistance. These cell lines comprised the “training” set of our pattern recognition algorithm. The post-treatment cell viability was evaluated by a fluorometric resazurin reduction assay. The X-axis depicts Rapamycin concentration; the Y-axis, the percentage of viable cells as compared to control. The values of each point represent the mean +/- standard deviation (SD) derived from octuplicate measurements. This was performed thrice for each cell line, with representative results shown. The Cmax in cancer patients, as derived from a phase I trial (15), is indicated by the gray vertical line. B. Using both conventional and modified T-test (see Materials and Methods), a signature of those genes differentially expressed between Rapamycin-sensitive and Rapamycin-resistant cell lines, with significance of p<0.03 was identified. This signature is represented here by a supervised clustering heatmap, as generated by the GenePattern Server. C. The signature shown in Figure 1B was analyzed with the SVM class prediction algorithm found on the GenePattern Server to predict response patterns of six additional cell lines (composing our Validation Set). The predicted and observed response patterns of those cell lines, along with corresponding IC50 levels, are shown.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Gene expression profiles of Rapamycin response of DLBCL cell lines identify central role for Akt
A-B. The signature shown in Figure 1B was analyzed using the Core Analysis function on the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) Server. A diagram of the top Network enriched by this analysis is shown (A). The most enriched Biological Functions, as determined by IPA Core Analysis of the same signature, are shown in Panel B, with Fisher's exact test p-values as shown. C. The Oncomine database was queried using gene name Akt1, using disease-type filter “Lymphoma.” This provided levels of Akt gene expression levels in healthy B-cells (C: Centroblast; GCB: germinal center B lymphocyte; n=6), Activated B-cell-like DLBCL (ABC-DLBCL; n=26), and GCB-like DLBCL (GCB-DLBCL; n=30) samples of primary (human) tissue samples. These data are represented here as a waterfall plot for each set of samples, in which the Y-axis represents log-2 median-centered ratio, and each sample is displayed in order of this ratio value. D. Protein levels of total Akt, and actin were assayed by Western blotting. Levels of total Akt were quantified as compared to actin (X-axis; measured with ImageJ as described in “Methods and Materials”), and then plotted against the IC50 (Y-axis) for that particular cell line.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Connectivity mapping can identify compounds targeting the PI3K/Akt pathway, which synergize with Rapamycin at clinically relevant doses
A. The signature of differentially-expressed genes was submitted for analysis to the Connectivity map (Cmap) server. Shown here are the rank, name, and Cmap score of selected compounds, each within the top 2% of perturbagens, as determined by analysis of this signature. B-C. 106 cells/ml of two Rapamycin-sensitive cell lines (SUDHL-6 and WSU-NHL) and two Rapamycin-resistant cell lines (SUDHL-4 and OCI-Ly19) DLBCL cells were treated with Rapamycin, an Akt inhibitor (either Nelfinavir or MK-2206), and the combination of Rapamycin and an Akt inhibitor, for 48h. Viability was assessed by a fluorometric resazurin reduction assay. Each experiment was performed in octuplicate, and repeated twice, with representative results shown. Viability patterns of the Rapamycin-resistant cell line SUDHL-4 treated with Rapamycin and Nelfinavir (Nelf) (B), and Rapamycin and MK-2206 (C), are shown. The Y-axis represents percentage of cells viable. D. Combination indices (CI) values were calculated using the Chou-Talalay equation, as employed by Calcusyn software, for the four cell lines described above (SUDHL-6, WSU-NHL, SUDHL-4 and OCI-Ly19). Shown here are the CI values observed in the SUDHL-4 cell line. Similar results, indicative of synergy, were achieved in the other three cell lines. E-F. 106 cells/ml of the same four DLBCL cell lines (SUDHL-6, WSU-NHL, SUDHL-4 and OCI-Ly19) were treated for 12 hours with Rapamycin and Nelfinavir (Nelf) (E), and Rapamycin and MK-2206 (F), and then analyzed by flow cytometry after staining with propidium iodide. Each experiment was repeated twice under independent conditions, with representative results shown. The proportion of cells in each treatment group found to be in S-phase is shown as a marker of cell cycle progression. The Y-axis represents percentage of cells in S-phase. G. Rapamycin-resistant cell lines (SUDHL-4 and OCI-Ly19) were treated for 6 hours with Rapamycin at 25 nM, MK-2206 at 300 nM, and the combination, after which cell lysates were prepared and analyzed by Western blot technique. Each experiment was repeated, with representative results provided. Shown here are results from analysis of cleaved caspase 3 (left) and cleaved PARP (right), in the SUDHL-4 cell line.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Akt activation is induced by Rapamycin treatment, and Akt inhibitors abrogate Rapamycin-induced Akt activation
A-B. 106 cells/ml of the same four DLBCL cell lines (SUDHL-6, WSU-NHL, SUDHL-4 and OCI-Ly19) were treated with Rapamycin, an Akt inhibitor (either Nelfinavir or MK-2206), and the combination of Rapamycin and Akt inhibitor for 3h and 6h. A flow-cytometry-based multiplex protein assay of phosphorylated Akt, as a proportion of total Akt, was performed in SUDHL-6 (Rapamycin-sensitive) cells treated with Rapamycin and Nelfinavir (A) and SU-DHL 4 (Rapamycin-resistant) cells treated with Rapamycin and MK-2206 (B). Each experiment was performed in triplicate, in independent conditions, with mean and SD displayed. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (t-test p value <0.05). C-D. One Rapamycin-resistant cell line (SUDHL-4) and one Rapamycin-sensitive cell line (SUDHL-6) were treated for 6 hours with Rapamycin (25 nM), Nelfinavir (15 uM), and the combination; or Rapamycin (25 nM), MK-2206 (300 nM), and the combination; after which cell lysates were prepared and analyzed by Western blot technique. Each experiment was repeated, with representative results provided. Shown here are results from analysis of phosphorylated Akt (p-Akt), phospho-S-6 ribosomal protein (p-S6RP), and phosphorylated 4-EBP-1 (p-4-EBP-1) in SUDHL-6 cells (C), and SUDHL-4 cells (D) treated with Rapamycin (5 nM) and MK-2206 (100 nM) for 6 hours.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sehn LH, Berry B, Chhanabhai M, Fitzgerald C, Gill K, Hoskins P, et al. The revised International Prognostic Index (R-IPI) is a better predictor of outcome than the standard IPI for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP. Blood. 2007;109:1857–61. - PubMed
    1. Hudes G, Carducci M, Tomczak P, Dutcher J, Figlin R, Kapoor A, et al. Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2271–81. - PubMed
    1. Hess G, Herbrecht R, Romaguera J, Verhoef G, Crump M, Gisselbrecht C, et al. Phase III study to evaluate temsirolimus compared with investigator's choice therapy for the treatment of relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3822–9. - PubMed
    1. Hess G, Smith SM, Berkenblit A, Coiffier B. Temsirolimus in mantle cell lymphoma and other non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes. Semin Oncol. 2009;36(3):S37–45. - PubMed
    1. Sehgal SN. Rapamune (Sirolimus, rapamycin): an overview and mechanism of action. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. 1995;17:660–5. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms