Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012;7(1):e29348.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029348. Epub 2012 Jan 17.

Comparing statistical methods for constructing large scale gene networks

Jeffrey D Allen  1 , Yang Xie, Min Chen, Luc Girard, Guanghua Xiao
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparing statistical methods for constructing large scale gene networks

Jeffrey D Allen et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

The gene regulatory network (GRN) reveals the regulatory relationships among genes and can provide a systematic understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying biological processes. The importance of computer simulations in understanding cellular processes is now widely accepted; a variety of algorithms have been developed to study these biological networks. The goal of this study is to provide a comprehensive evaluation and a practical guide to aid in choosing statistical methods for constructing large scale GRNs. Using both simulation studies and a real application in E. coli data, we compare different methods in terms of sensitivity and specificity in identifying the true connections and the hub genes, the ease of use, and computational speed. Our results show that these algorithms performed reasonably well, and each method has its own advantages: (1) GeneNet, WGCNA (Weighted Correlation Network Analysis), and ARACNE (Algorithm for the Reconstruction of Accurate Cellular Networks) performed well in constructing the global network structure; (2) GeneNet and SPACE (Sparse PArtial Correlation Estimation) performed well in identifying a few connections with high specificity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Diagram depicting the network structures of each of the six network sizes used in this study.
Figure 2
Figure 2. The AUCs and pAUCs for 1344-gene network in simulation 1.
Left: The area under the curve using various network construction methods across various sample sizes on a network with 1344 genes; Right: The partial area under the curve for FPRformula image0.005 for various methods.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of the AUC performance on detecting hub genes.
Measuring the performance of each method at detecting hub genes as measured by the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC). Hub genes were classified as having 4 or more connections in the true network.
Figure 4
Figure 4. The AUCs for 1344-gene network in simulation 2 with non-normal distribution.
The area under the curve using various network construction methods across various sample sizes on a network with 1344 genes.
Figure 5
Figure 5. The transcriptional regulatory network for E. coli derived from the RegulonDB database.
Each red dot is a gene, and a blue line between genes indicates a connection.
Figure 6
Figure 6. The performance in constructing gene regulatory network in E. coli.
Left: The entire ROC curves using various network construction methods; Right: The corner of ROC with high specificity.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Friedman N. Inferring cellular networks using probabilistic graphical models. Science. 2004;303:799–805. - PubMed
    1. Ihmels J, Friedlander G, Bergmann S, Sarig O, Ziv Y, et al. Revealing modular organization in the yeast transcriptional network. Nat Genet. 2002;31:370–7. - PubMed
    1. Lee I, Date SV, Adai AT, Marcotte EM. A probabilistic functional network of yeast genes. Science. 2004;306:1555–8. - PubMed
    1. Sachs K, Perez O, Pe'er D, Lauffenburger DA, Nolan GP. Causal protein-signaling networks derived from multiparameter single-cell data. Science. 2005;308:523–9. - PubMed
    1. Segal E, Shapira M, Regev A, Pe'er D, Botstein D, et al. Module networks: identifying regulatory modules and their condition-specific regulators from gene expression data. Nat Genet. 2003;34:166–76. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources