Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 May;20(5):1109-14.
doi: 10.1038/oby.2011.367. Epub 2012 Jan 12.

Dual-energy X-ray performs as well as clinical computed tomography for the measurement of visceral fat

Lisa K Micklesfield  1 , Julia H Goedecke, Mark Punyanitya, Kevin E Wilson, Thomas L Kelly
Affiliations
Free PMC article
Comparative Study

Dual-energy X-ray performs as well as clinical computed tomography for the measurement of visceral fat

Lisa K Micklesfield et al. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012 May.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is associated with adverse health effects including cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. We developed a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurement of visceral adipose tissue (DXA-VAT) as a low cost and low radiation alternative to computed tomography (CT). DXA-VAT was compared to VAT assessed using CT by an expert reader (E-VAT). In addition, the same CT slice was also read by a clinical radiographer (C-VAT) and a best-fit anthropomorphic and demographic VAT model (A-VAT) was developed. Whole body DXA, CT at L4-L5, and anthropometry were measured on 272 black and white South African women (age 29 ± 8 years, BMI 28 ± 7 kg/m(2), waist circumference (WC) 89 ± 16 cm). Approximately one-half of the dataset (n = 141) was randomly selected and used as a training set for the development of DXA-VAT and A-VAT, which were then used to estimate VAT on the remaining 131 women in a blinded fashion. DXA-VAT (r = 0.93, standard error of the estimate (SEE) = 16 cm(2)) and C-VAT (r = 0.93, SEE = 16 cm(2)) were strongly correlated to E-VAT. These correlations with E-VAT were significantly stronger (P < 0.001) than the correlations of individual anthropometry measurements and the A-VAT model (WC + age, r = 0.79, SEE = 27 cm(2)). The inclusion of anthropometric and demographic measurements did not substantially improve the correlation between DXA-VAT and E-VAT. DXA-VAT performed as well as a clinical read of VAT from a CT scan and better than anthropomorphic and demographic models.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
DXA-VAT region of measurement. The pure subcutaneous fat lateral to the abdominal muscles can be seen in the image. DXA-VAT, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-visceral adipose tissue.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlations between (a) E-VAT and DXA-VAT,(b) C-VAT, and (c) A-VAT. Only the validation set data are plotted for DXA-VAT and A-VAT, whereas the complete study set are plotted for C-VAT. A-VAT, anthropomorphic and demographic VAT model; C-VAT, clinical radiographer-VAT; DXA-VAT, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-visceral adipose tissue; E-VAT, expert reader-VAT; SEE, standard error of the estimate; VAT, visceral adipose tissue.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Bland–Altman plots and linear regression estimate, with 95% prediction bands, between (a) E-VAT and DXA-VAT, (b) C-VAT, and (c) A-VAT. A-VAT, anthropomorphic and demographic VAT model; C-VAT, clinical radiographer-VAT; DXA-VAT, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-visceral adipose tissue; E-VAT, expert reader-VAT; VAT, visceral adipose tissue.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Bouchard C. BMI, fat mass, abdominal adiposity and visceral fat: where is the 'beef'. Int J Obes (Lond) 2007;31:1552–1553. - PubMed
    1. Schoeller DA, Tylavsky FA, Baer DJ.et al. QDR 4500A dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer underestimates fat mass in comparison with criterion methods in adults Am J Clin Nutr 2005811018–1025. - PubMed
    1. Chen Z, Wang Z, Lohman T.et al. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is a valid tool for assessing skeletal muscle mass in older women J Nutr 20071372775–2780. - PubMed
    1. Blake GM, Naeem M, Boutros M. Comparison of effective dose to children and adults from dual X-ray absorptiometry examinations. Bone. 2006;38:935–942. - PubMed
    1. Lee K, Lee S, Kim YJ, Kim YJ. Waist circumference, dual-energy X-ray absortiometrically measured abdominal adiposity, and computed tomographically derived intra-abdominal fat area on detecting metabolic risk factors in obese women. Nutrition. 2008;24:625–631. - PubMed

Publication types