Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May;109(5):1259-68.
doi: 10.1002/bit.24409. Epub 2012 Jan 17.

Different expression systems for production of recombinant proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Affiliations

Different expression systems for production of recombinant proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Zihe Liu et al. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012 May.

Abstract

Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has become an attractive cell factory for production of commodity and speciality chemicals and proteins, such as industrial enzymes and pharmaceutical proteins. Here we evaluate most important expression factors for recombinant protein secretion: we chose two different proteins (insulin precursor (IP) and α-amylase), two different expression vectors (POTud plasmid and CPOTud plasmid) and two kinds of leader sequences (the glycosylated alpha factor leader and a synthetic leader with no glycosylation sites). We used IP and α-amylase as representatives of a simple protein and a multi-domain protein, as well as a non-glycosylated protein and a glycosylated protein, respectively. The genes coding for the two recombinant proteins were fused independently with two different leader sequences and were expressed using two different plasmid systems, resulting in eight different strains that were evaluated by batch fermentations. The secretion level (µmol/L) of IP was found to be higher than that of α-amylase for all expression systems and we also found larger variation in IP production for the different vectors. We also found that there is a change in protein production kinetics during the diauxic shift, that is, the IP was produced at higher rate during the glucose uptake phase, whereas amylase was produced at a higher rate in the ethanol uptake phase. For comparison, we also refer to data from another study, (Tyo et al. submitted) in which we used the p426GPD plasmid (standard vector using URA3 as marker gene and pGPD1 as expression promoter). For the IP there is more than 10-fold higher protein production with the CPOTud vector compared with the standard URA3-based vector, and this vector system therefore represent a valuable resource for future studies and optimization of recombinant protein production in yeast.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Construction of recombinant vectors for production of PI and α-amylase. (A) Structure of synthesized insulin cassettes and α-amylase casettes. (B) Overview of plasmid constructions. (I) from psP-G2 to POTud plamid-PGK1 promoter and ADH1 terminator were replaced by POT1 gene with its own promoter and terminator and URA3 cassette was deleted; (II) from POTud to CPOTud plasmid-TEF1 promoter and CYC1 terminator were replaced by TPI1 promoter and terminator; (III) separately insert four different genes into POTud vector between TEF1 promoter and CYC1 terminator to generate four new plasmids; (IV) separately insert four different genes into CPOTud vector between TPI1 promoter and terminator to generate four new plasmids. (Light): psP-G2 plasmid backbone; (Dark): new fragments compared to psP-G2 plasmid.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Construction of recombinant vectors for production of PI and α-amylase. (A) Structure of synthesized insulin cassettes and α-amylase casettes. (B) Overview of plasmid constructions. (I) from psP-G2 to POTud plamid-PGK1 promoter and ADH1 terminator were replaced by POT1 gene with its own promoter and terminator and URA3 cassette was deleted; (II) from POTud to CPOTud plasmid-TEF1 promoter and CYC1 terminator were replaced by TPI1 promoter and terminator; (III) separately insert four different genes into POTud vector between TEF1 promoter and CYC1 terminator to generate four new plasmids; (IV) separately insert four different genes into CPOTud vector between TPI1 promoter and terminator to generate four new plasmids. (Light): psP-G2 plasmid backbone; (Dark): new fragments compared to psP-G2 plasmid.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Confirmation of insulin precursor synthesis by Western blot using goat polyclonal antibody sc7839 and donkey anti-goat horseradish peroxidase (HRP) secondary antibody sc2033 (Santa cruz, USA). (A) Sample summaries. (B) Western blot figure showed additional band of the insulin variant. Abbreviations: Ts (the sample after inoculation), Tg (the sample by the end of the glucose phase), Tf (the sample by the end of the fermentation), AIC (the strain with pAlphaInsCPOT plasmid), SIC (the strain with pSynInsCPOT plasmid). Spectra multicolor low rang protein ladder was used in here.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Confirmation of insulin precursor synthesis by Western blot using goat polyclonal antibody sc7839 and donkey anti-goat horseradish peroxidase (HRP) secondary antibody sc2033 (Santa cruz, USA). (A) Sample summaries. (B) Western blot figure showed additional band of the insulin variant. Abbreviations: Ts (the sample after inoculation), Tg (the sample by the end of the glucose phase), Tf (the sample by the end of the fermentation), AIC (the strain with pAlphaInsCPOT plasmid), SIC (the strain with pSynInsCPOT plasmid). Spectra multicolor low rang protein ladder was used in here.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Protein yields in the glucose phase. (A) Insulin producing strains. (B) α-amylase producing strains. Error bars are based on independent duplicate experiments. Abbreviations: NC (the strain with CPOTud plasmid), AIP (the strain with pAlphaInsPOT plasmid), SIP (the strain with pSynInsPOT plasmid), AIC (the strain with pAlphaInsCPOT plasmid), SIC (the strain with pSynInsCPOT plasmid), WA (the strain with the synthetic-leader-amylase plasmid), AAP (the strain with pAlphaAmyPOT plasmid), SAP (the strain with pSynAmyPOT plasmid), AAC (the strain with pAlphaAmyCPOT plasmid), SAC (the strain with pSyntheticAmyCPOT plasmid).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Protein yields in the glucose phase. (A) Insulin producing strains. (B) α-amylase producing strains. Error bars are based on independent duplicate experiments. Abbreviations: NC (the strain with CPOTud plasmid), AIP (the strain with pAlphaInsPOT plasmid), SIP (the strain with pSynInsPOT plasmid), AIC (the strain with pAlphaInsCPOT plasmid), SIC (the strain with pSynInsCPOT plasmid), WA (the strain with the synthetic-leader-amylase plasmid), AAP (the strain with pAlphaAmyPOT plasmid), SAP (the strain with pSynAmyPOT plasmid), AAC (the strain with pAlphaAmyCPOT plasmid), SAC (the strain with pSyntheticAmyCPOT plasmid).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Final protein production results. (A) Final protein productions for all strains, in μmol/l. (B) Final protein productions for all strains in mg/L. Error bars are based on independent duplicate experiments.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Final protein production results. (A) Final protein productions for all strains, in μmol/l. (B) Final protein productions for all strains in mg/L. Error bars are based on independent duplicate experiments.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Secretion profiles of IP and α-amylase strains. Protein productions were plotted versus cell growth (expressed as dry cell weight, DCW) to compare single cell producing capacity. (Circle) protein production (mg/l), (Diamond) Glucose concentration (g/l) and (Triangle) Ethanol concentration (g/l). (A) IP production by strain SIC. (B) α-amylase production by strain SAC.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Secretion profiles of IP and α-amylase strains. Protein productions were plotted versus cell growth (expressed as dry cell weight, DCW) to compare single cell producing capacity. (Circle) protein production (mg/l), (Diamond) Glucose concentration (g/l) and (Triangle) Ethanol concentration (g/l). (A) IP production by strain SIC. (B) α-amylase production by strain SAC.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Achstetter T, Wolf D. Hormone processing and membrane-bound proteinases in yeast. EMBO J. 1985;4(1):173–177. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agaphonov M, Romanova N, Choi E, Ter-Avanesyan M. A novel kanamycin/G418 resistance marker for direct selection of transformants in Escherichia coli and different yeast species. Yeast. 2010;27(4):189–195. - PubMed
    1. Aggarwal S. What’s fueling the biotech engine—2009–2010. Nat Biotech. 2010;28(11):1165–1171. - PubMed
    1. Alao J, Olesch J, Sunnerhagen P. Inhibition of type I histone deacetylase increases resistance of checkpoint-deficient cells to genotoxic agents through mitotic delay. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009;8(9):2606–2615. - PubMed
    1. Alexandre H, Ansanay-Galeote V, Dequin S, Blondin B. Global gene expression during short-term ethanol stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 2001;498(1):98–103. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources