Immunological variation between inbred laboratory mouse strains: points to consider in phenotyping genetically immunomodified mice
- PMID: 22135019
- DOI: 10.1177/0300985811429314
Immunological variation between inbred laboratory mouse strains: points to consider in phenotyping genetically immunomodified mice
Abstract
Inbred laboratory mouse strains are highly divergent in their immune response patterns as a result of genetic mutations and polymorphisms. The generation of genetically engineered mice (GEM) has, in the past, used embryonic stem (ES) cells for gene targeting from various 129 substrains followed by backcrossing into more fecund mouse strains. Although common inbred mice are considered "immune competent," many have variations in their immune system-some of which have been described-that may affect the phenotype. Recognition of these immune variations among commonly used inbred mouse strains is essential for the accurate interpretation of expected phenotypes or those that may arise unexpectedly. In GEM developed to study specific components of the immune system, accurate evaluation of immune responses must take into consideration not only the gene of interest but also how the background strain and microbial milieu contribute to the manifestation of findings in these mice. This article discusses points to consider regarding immunological differences between the common inbred laboratory mouse strains, particularly in their use as background strains in GEM.
Similar articles
-
Translating Mouse Models.Toxicol Pathol. 2017 Jan;45(1):134-145. doi: 10.1177/0192623316675767. Epub 2016 Nov 4. Toxicol Pathol. 2017. PMID: 27815489
-
The influence of genetic background on spontaneous and genetically engineered mouse models of complex diseases.Lab Anim (NY). 2001 May;30(5):34-9. Lab Anim (NY). 2001. PMID: 11385732 Review.
-
Mouse phenome research: implications of genetic background.ILAR J. 2006;47(2):94-102. doi: 10.1093/ilar.47.2.94. ILAR J. 2006. PMID: 16547366 Review.
-
PWD/Ph and PWK/Ph inbred mouse strains of Mus m. musculus subspecies--a valuable resource of phenotypic variations and genomic polymorphisms.Folia Biol (Praha). 2000;46(1):31-41. Folia Biol (Praha). 2000. PMID: 10730880 Review.
-
The gene or not the gene--that is the question: understanding the genetically engineered mouse phenotype.Vet Pathol. 2012 Jan;49(1):5-15. doi: 10.1177/0300985811421324. Epub 2011 Oct 4. Vet Pathol. 2012. PMID: 21971987 Review.
Cited by
-
Rodent models for oral microbiome research: considerations and challenges- a mini review.Front Oral Health. 2024 Oct 1;5:1439091. doi: 10.3389/froh.2024.1439091. eCollection 2024. Front Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 39421460 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sex-specific alterations in pulmonary metabolic, xenobiotic and lipid signalling pathways after e-cigarette aerosol exposure during adolescence in mice.BMJ Open Respir Res. 2024 Sep 18;11(1):e002423. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002423. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2024. PMID: 39299769 Free PMC article.
-
Hepatitis E virus immunosuppressed animal models.BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Sep 12;24(1):965. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09870-4. BMC Infect Dis. 2024. PMID: 39266958 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Murine Models of Familial Cytokine Storm Syndromes.Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024;1448:481-496. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-59815-9_33. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024. PMID: 39117835 Review.
-
Inbred Mouse Models in Cryptococcus neoformans Research.J Fungi (Basel). 2024 Jun 17;10(6):426. doi: 10.3390/jof10060426. J Fungi (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38921412 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous