Complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction utilizing acellular dermal matrix: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 22084645
- PMCID: PMC3208410
Complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction utilizing acellular dermal matrix: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: The recent increase in popularity of acellular dermal matrix assistance in immediate expander/implant breast reconstruction has led to variety of viewpoints. Many studies are published indicating an increase in complications with the use of acellular dermal matrix, while others indicate there is no increase in complications.
Methods: This meta-analysis utilizes information from available studies that directly compare one specific type of acellular dermal matrix with traditional methods of immediate expander/implant breast reconstruction. Eight studies were found through a meticulous literature search that met these criteria.
Results: There was more than a 2-fold increase in the number of infections and explanations in the acellular dermal matrix group compared to the control. There was a 3-fold increase in seroma formation in the acellular dermal matrix group compared to the control. There was a significant difference of intraoperative fill volumes between the acellular dermal matrix group compared to the control.
Conclusions: This study illustrates that after pooling all available date regarding the use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate expander/implant breast reconstruction there appears to be an increased rate of complications. However, the increased intraoperative fill volume may lead to ultimately greater patient satisfaction.
Figures
![Figure 1](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5f8/3208410/5cdb4efaf4f5/eplasty11e40_fig1.gif)
![Figure 2](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5f8/3208410/deb84865574c/eplasty11e40_fig2.gif)
![Figure 3](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5f8/3208410/bd7aed9dbdf0/eplasty11e40_fig3.gif)
![Figure 4](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5f8/3208410/8afd8f2f0c59/eplasty11e40_fig4.gif)
![Figure 5](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5f8/3208410/be190107a84e/eplasty11e40_fig5.gif)
Similar articles
-
Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction: a systematic and critical review of efficacy and associated morbidity.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Dec;128(6):1162-1169. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318230c29e. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011. PMID: 22094735 Review.
-
Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Feb;125(2):429-436. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c82d90. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010. PMID: 20124828
-
Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Assessment of Risks and Benefits.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec;140(6):1091-1100. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003842. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017. PMID: 28806288 Free PMC article.
-
The cost effectiveness of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant immediate breast reconstruction.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Apr;67(4):468-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.12.035. Epub 2014 Jan 23. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014. PMID: 24508194 Review.
-
The use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 May;129(5):1049-1058. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824a2acb. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012. PMID: 22544088
Cited by
-
An Alternative Technique for Immediate Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction-A Case Series.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Jul 22;4(7):e821. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000839. eCollection 2016 Jul. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016. PMID: 27536500 Free PMC article.
-
The BREASTrial Stage II: ADM Breast Reconstruction Outcomes from Definitive Reconstruction to 3 Months Postoperative.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Jan 25;5(1):e1209. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001209. eCollection 2017 Jan. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017. PMID: 28203509 Free PMC article.
-
Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction after Risk-Reducing Mastectomy in BRCA Mutation Carriers: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 13;11(12):1741. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121741. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37372859 Free PMC article.
-
Daily serum collection after acellular dermal matrix-assisted breast reconstruction.Arch Plast Surg. 2015 May;42(3):321-6. doi: 10.5999/aps.2015.42.3.321. Epub 2015 May 14. Arch Plast Surg. 2015. PMID: 26015888 Free PMC article.
-
Breast reconstruction following prophylactic or therapeutic mastectomy for breast cancer: Recommendations from an evidence-based provincial guideline.Plast Surg (Oakv). 2014 Summer;22(2):103-11. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2014. PMID: 25114623 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Breuing KH, Warren SM. Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55(3):232–9. - PubMed
-
- Sbitany H, Sandeen SN, Amalfi AN, Davenport MS, Langstein HN. Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: a head-to-head comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(6):1735–40. - PubMed
-
- Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(2):429–36. - PubMed
-
- Lanier ST, Wang ED, Chen JJ, et al. The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64(5):674–78. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous