Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Oct;141(10):1898-906.
doi: 10.3945/jn.111.141473. Epub 2011 Aug 31.

Food acculturation drives dietary differences among Mexicans, Mexican Americans, and Non-Hispanic Whites

Carolina Batis  1 , Lucia Hernandez-Barrera, Simon Barquera, Juan A Rivera, Barry M Popkin
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Food acculturation drives dietary differences among Mexicans, Mexican Americans, and Non-Hispanic Whites

Carolina Batis et al. J Nutr. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

Our aim was to examine the effects of food acculturation on Mexican Americans' (MA) diets, taking the Mexican diet as reference. We used nationally representative samples of children (2-11 y) and female adolescents and adults (12-49 y) from the Mexican National Nutrition Survey 1999 and NHANES 1999-2006 to compare the diets of Mexicans (n = 5678), MA born in Mexico (MAMX) (n = 1488), MA born in the United States (MAUS) (n = 3654), and non-Hispanic white Americans (NH-White) (n = 5473). One 24-h diet recall was used to examine the percentage consuming and percentage energy consumed from selected food groups. Most of the food groups analyzed displayed a fairly linear increase or decrease in percent energy/capita intake in this order: Mexican, MAMX, MAUS, NH-White. However, few significant differences were observed among the US subpopulations, especially among MAUS and NH-Whites. Overall, compared to Mexicans, the US subpopulations had greater intakes of saturated fat, sugar, dessert and salty snacks, pizza and French fries, low-fat meat and fish, high-fiber bread, and low-fat milk, as well as decreased intakes of corn tortillas, low-fiber bread, high-fat milk, and Mexican fast food. Furthermore, the patterns were similar in all age groups. Although we found a mix of positive and negative aspects of food acculturation, the overall proportion of energy obtained from unhealthy foods was higher among the US subpopulations. Our findings indicate that within one generation in the US, the influence of the Mexican diet is almost lost. In addition, our results reinforce the need to discourage critical unhealthful components of the American diet among MA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author disclosures: C. Batis, L. Hernandez-Barrera, S. Barquera, J. A. Rivera, and B. M. Popkin, no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The percentage of Mexican, MA, and NH-White (NHANES 1999-2006) adult women consuming different types of beverages. n = 1978 (Mexican), 802 (MAMX), 486 MAUS, or 2297 NH-White. Percentages without a common letter differ, P < 0.01 (z-test with Bonferroni correction). MA, Mexican American; MAMX, Mexican American born in Mexico; MAUS, Mexican American born in the US; MNS, Mexican Nutrition Survey; NH-White, non-Hispanic white.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Percentage energy per capita from food groups with a difference of at least ≥4% among any 2 subpopulations in Mexican (MNS 1999), MA, and NH-White (NHANES 1999-2006) adult women. n = 1978 (Mexican), 802 (MAMX), 486 (MAUS), or 2297 (NH-White). Percentages without a common letter differ, P < 0.01 (z-test with Bonferroni correction). MA, Mexican American; MAMX, Mexican American born in Mexico; MAUS, Mexican American born in the US; MNS, Mexican Nutrition Survey; NH-White, non-Hispanic white.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Mean percentage of total energy per capita from selected food groups aggregated into healthy or unhealthy items in Mexican (MNS 1999), MA, and NH-White (NHANES 1999-2006). Healthy 1 includes low-fat milk, low-fat meat and fish, beans and other legumes, nuts and seeds, high-fiber bread, tortillas (corn and wheat), and fruits and vegetables. Healthy 2 includes the same items as Healthy 1 but excludes tortillas. Unhealthy includes regular soda, high-fat milk, medium- and high-fat meat, low-fiber bread, desserts, salty snacks, Mexican fast food, pizza, and French fries. n = 5678 (Mexicans), 1488 (MAMX), 3654 (MAUS), or 5473 (NH-Whites). Percentages without a common letter differ, P < 0.01 (z-test with Bonferroni correction). MA, Mexican American; MAMX, Mexican American born in Mexico; MAUS, Mexican American born in the US; MNS, Mexican Nutrition Survey; NH-White, non-Hispanic white.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Humes KR, Jones NA, Ramirez RR. Overview of race and Hispanic origin: 2010: US Census Bureau; 2011
    1. Ramirez RR, de la Cruz GP. The Hispanic population in the United States: March 2002. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2002
    1. Day JC. Population projections of the United States by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin: 1995 to 2050. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, US Bureau of the Census; 1996
    1. Morales LS, Lara M, Kington RS, Valdez RO, Escarce JJ. Socioeconomic, cultural, and behavioral factors affecting Hispanic health outcomes. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2002;13:477–503 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barcenas CH, Wilkinson AV, Strom SS, Cao Y, Saunders KC, Mahabir S, Hernandez-Valero MA, Forman MR, Spitz MR, Bondy ML. Birthplace, years of residence in the United States, and obesity among Mexican-American adults. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007;15:1043–52 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms