Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study
- PMID: 21783417
- DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70184-X
Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study
Abstract
Background: Activating mutations in EGFR are important markers of response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The OPTIMAL study compared efficacy and tolerability of the TKI erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.
Methods: We undertook an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial at 22 centres in China. Patients older than 18 years with histologically confirmed stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and a confirmed activating mutation of EGFR (exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R point mutation) received either oral erlotinib (150 mg/day) until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects, or up to four cycles of gemcitabine plus carboplatin. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with a minimisation procedure and were stratified according to EGFR mutation type, histological subtype (adenocarcinoma vs non-adenocarcinoma), and smoking status. The primary outcome was progression-free survival, analysed in patients with confirmed disease who received at least one dose of study treatment. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00874419, and has completed enrolment; patients are still in follow-up.
Findings: 83 patients were randomly assigned to receive erlotinib and 82 to receive gemcitabine plus carboplatin; 82 in the erlotinib group and 72 in the chemotherapy group were included in analysis of the primary endpoint. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer in erlotinib-treated patients than in those on chemotherapy (13.1 [95% CI 10.58-16.53] vs 4.6 [4.21-5.42] months; hazard ratio 0.16, 95% CI 0.10-0.26; p<0.0001). Chemotherapy was associated with more grade 3 or 4 toxic effects than was erlotinib (including neutropenia in 30 [42%] of 72 patients and thrombocytopenia in 29 [40%] patients on chemotherapy vs no patients with either event on erlotinib); the most common grade 3 or 4 toxic effects with erlotinib were increased alanine aminotransferase concentrations (three [4%] of 83 patients) and skin rash (two [2%] patients). Chemotherapy was also associated with increased treatment-related serious adverse events (ten [14%] of 72 patients [decreased platelet count, n=8; decreased neutrophil count, n=1; hepatic dysfunction, n=1] vs two [2%] of 83 patients [both hepatic dysfunction]).
Interpretation: Compared with standard chemotherapy, erlotinib conferred a significant progression-free survival benefit in patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC and was associated with more favourable tolerability. These findings suggest that erlotinib is important for first-line treatment of patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.
Funding: F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd (China); Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Erlotinib, gefitinib, or chemotherapy for EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer?Lancet Oncol. 2011 Aug;12(8):710-1. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70194-2. Epub 2011 Jul 23. Lancet Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21783418 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2012 Mar;13(3):239-46. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70393-X. Epub 2012 Jan 26. Lancet Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22285168 Clinical Trial.
-
Intercalated combination of chemotherapy and erlotinib for patients with advanced stage non-small-cell lung cancer (FASTACT-2): a randomised, double-blind trial.Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jul;14(8):777-86. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70254-7. Epub 2013 Jun 17. Lancet Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23782814 Clinical Trial.
-
Erlotinib plus bevacizumab versus erlotinib alone in patients with EGFR-positive advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NEJ026): interim analysis of an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2019 May;20(5):625-635. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30035-X. Epub 2019 Apr 8. Lancet Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30975627 Clinical Trial.
-
First-line treatment of advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation positive non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 25;(5):CD010383. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010383.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 18;3:CD010383. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010383.pub3 PMID: 27223332 Updated. Review.
-
Gefitinib or Erlotinib vs Chemotherapy for EGFR Mutation-Positive Lung Cancer: Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Overall Survival.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Jun 1;109(6). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw279. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017. PMID: 28376144 Review.
Cited by
-
Resistance Profile of Osimertinib in Pre-treated Patients With EGFR T790M-Mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.Front Oncol. 2021 May 6;11:602924. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.602924. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34026599 Free PMC article.
-
MET as a possible target for non-small-cell lung cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2013 Mar 10;31(8):1089-96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.9422. Epub 2013 Feb 11. J Clin Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23401458 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Afatinib versus cisplatin plus pemetrexed in Japanese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring activating EGFR mutations: Subgroup analysis of LUX-Lung 3.Cancer Sci. 2015 Sep;106(9):1202-11. doi: 10.1111/cas.12723. Epub 2015 Jul 25. Cancer Sci. 2015. PMID: 26094656 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
ERβ localization influenced outcomes of EGFR-TKI treatment in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations.Sci Rep. 2015 Jun 22;5:11392. doi: 10.1038/srep11392. Sci Rep. 2015. PMID: 26096604 Free PMC article.
-
Cell-free DNA from cerebrospinal fluid can be used to detect the EGFR mutation status of lung adenocarcinoma patients with central nervous system metastasis.Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Feb;10(2):914-925. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-21-62. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021. PMID: 33718032 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous