Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Aug;94(2):486-94.
doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.011684. Epub 2011 Jun 29.

Effects of vitamin D and calcium supplementation on pancreatic β cell function, insulin sensitivity, and glycemia in adults at high risk of diabetes: the Calcium and Vitamin D for Diabetes Mellitus (CaDDM) randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of vitamin D and calcium supplementation on pancreatic β cell function, insulin sensitivity, and glycemia in adults at high risk of diabetes: the Calcium and Vitamin D for Diabetes Mellitus (CaDDM) randomized controlled trial

Joanna Mitri et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

Background: A suboptimal vitamin D and calcium status has been associated with higher risk of type 2 diabetes in observational studies, but evidence from trials is lacking.

Objective: We determined whether vitamin D supplementation, with or without calcium, improved glucose homeostasis in adults at high risk of diabetes.

Design: Ninety-two adults were randomly assigned in a 2-by-2 factorial-design, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial to receive either cholecalciferol (2000 IU once daily) or calcium carbonate (400 mg twice daily) for 16 wk. The primary outcome was the change in pancreatic β cell function as measured by the disposition index after an intravenous-glucose-tolerance test. Other outcomes were acute insulin response, insulin sensitivity, and measures of glycemia.

Results: Participants had a mean age of 57 y, a body mass index (BMI; in kg/m(2)) of 32, and glycated hemoglobin (Hb A(1c)) of 5.9%. There was no significant vitamin D × calcium interaction on any outcomes. The disposition index increased in the vitamin D group and decreased in the no-vitamin D group (adjusted mean change ± SE: 300 ± 130 compared with -126 ± 127, respectively; P = 0.011), which was explained by an improvement in insulin secretion (62 ± 39 compared with -36 ± 37 mU · L(-1) · min, respectively; P = 0.046). Hb A(1c) increased less, but nonsignificantly, in the vitamin D group than in the no-vitamin D group (0.06 ± 0.03% compared with 0.14 ± 0.03%, respectively; P = 0.081). There was no significant difference in any outcomes with calcium compared with no calcium.

Conclusion: In adults at risk of type 2 diabetes, short-term supplementation with cholecalciferol improved β cell function and had a marginal effect on attenuating the rise in Hb A(1c). This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00436475.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Flow of participants. Data on the primary outcome (the disposition index) were not available for 4 participants either because the frequently sampled intravenous-glucose-tolerance test was not done at baseline and follow-up (n = 1) or the test was stopped prematurely because of symptomatic hypoglycemia and the disposition index could not be estimated (n = 3). These 4 participants were excluded from the analysis of the primary outcome (the disposition index) and insulin sensitivity index, but they all contributed data to secondary outcomes (insulin secretion and measures of glycemia). Data from participants who withdrew or who were lost to follow-up were included in the analysis by carrying over their baseline values.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Mean (±SEM) changes in the disposition index between baseline and week 16. All data are least squares means adjusted for stratified variables (age and BMI), the baseline value of the outcome variable, race, and time of study entry. A: Changes in the disposition index between vitamin D (300 ± 130) and no vitamin D (−126 ± 127) or between calcium (79 ± 130) and no calcium (83 ± 135). P values are for the ANOVA test for differences in means between vitamin D and no vitamin D or between calcium and no calcium. B: Changes in the disposition index for vitamin D and calcium (286 ± 169) compared with vitamin D alone (315 ± 181) compared with calcium alone (−122 ± 176) compared with placebo (−128 ± 173). P values are for the ANOVA test for differences in means compared with placebo. P = 0.92 for the vitamin D × calcium interaction.

Comment in

  • Nutrition updates.
    D'Anci KE. D'Anci KE. Nutr Rev. 2011 Sep;69(9):558-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2011.00426.x. Nutr Rev. 2011. PMID: 21884135 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baz-Hecht M, Goldfine AB. The impact of vitamin D deficiency on diabetes and cardiovascular risk. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2010;17:113–9 - PubMed
    1. Norman AW, Frankel JB, Heldt AM, Grodsky GM. Vitamin D deficiency inhibits pancreatic secretion of insulin. Science 1980;209:823–5 - PubMed
    1. Cade C, Norman AW. Rapid normalization/stimulation by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 of insulin secretion and glucose tolerance in the vitamin D-deficient rat. Endocrinology 1987;120:1490–7 - PubMed
    1. Pittas AG, Lau J, Hu FB, Dawson-Hughes B. The role of vitamin D and calcium in type 2 diabetes. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;92:2017–29 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pittas AG, Chung M, Trikalinos T, et al. Systematic review: vitamin D and cardiometabolic outcomes. Ann Intern Med 2010;152:307–14 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data