Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May;84(5):764-72.
doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0624.

Economic value of dengue vaccine in Thailand

Affiliations

Economic value of dengue vaccine in Thailand

Bruce Y Lee et al. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011 May.

Abstract

With several candidate dengue vaccines under development, this is an important time to help stakeholders (e.g., policy makers, scientists, clinicians, and manufacturers) better understand the potential economic value (cost-effectiveness) of a dengue vaccine, especially while vaccine characteristics and strategies might be readily altered. We developed a decision analytic Markov simulation model to evaluate the potential health and economic value of administering a dengue vaccine to an individual (≤ 1 year of age) in Thailand from the societal perspective. Sensitivity analyses evaluated the effects of ranging various vaccine (e.g., cost, efficacy, side effect), epidemiological (dengue risk), and disease (treatment-seeking behavior) characteristics. A ≥ 50% efficacious vaccine was highly cost-effective [< 1× per capita gross domestic product (GDP) ($4,289)] up to a total vaccination cost of $60 and cost-effective [< 3× per capita GDP ($12,868)] up to a total vaccination cost of $200. When the total vaccine series was $1.50, many scenarios were cost saving.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
General model structure: (A) Disease Model, (B) Disease Model Subtree for paths of an individual who begins in the Susceptible Dengue Naive state. (C) Disease Model Subtree for paths of an individual after being infected with either form of symptomatic dengue; dengue fever (DF) or dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF). *Once a “Susceptible Dengue Naive” individual gets an infection with symptomatic or asymptomatic dengue, after they recover, they can only go to the “Susceptible Dengue Exposed” state to begin new probabilities of infection. Once an individual has experienced 2 infections, they go to the “Immune” state. **Refers to mortality resulting from causes unrelated to dengue (based on Thailand-specific life expectancy and mortality tables).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of dengue vaccination in U.S. dollars. Strategies are highly cost-effective at and ICER of < 4,289 (dotted line) and remain cost-effective until 12,868 (dashed line), where it becomes not cost-effective. (A) Dengue risk 5%, (B) dengue risk 9%, and (C) dengue risk %15

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pediatric Dengue Vaccine Initiative Global Burden of Disease. 2009. http://www.pdvi.org/about_dengue/GBD.asp Available at. Accessed December 20, 2010.
    1. Shepard DS, Suaya JA, Halstead SB, Nathan MB, Gubler DJ, Mahoney RT, Wang DN, Meltzer MI. Cost-effectiveness of a pediatric dengue vaccine. Vaccine. 2004;22:1275–1280. - PubMed
    1. Nagao Y, Koelle K. Decreases in dengue transmission may act to increase the incidence of dengue hemorrhagic fever. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:2238–2243. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Suaya JA, Shepard DS, Chang MS, Caram M, Hoyer S, Socheat D, Chantha N, Nathan MB. Cost-effectiveness of annual targeted larviciding campaigns in Cambodia against the dengue vector Aedes aegypti. Trop Med Int Health. 2007;12:1026–1036. - PubMed
    1. Lambrechts L, Scott TW, Gubler DJ. Consequences of the expanding global distribution of Aedes albopictus for dengue virus transmission. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e646. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances