How to judge a book by its cover? How useful are bibliometric indices for the evaluation of "scientific quality" or "scientific productivity"?
- PMID: 21507617
- DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2011.03.011
How to judge a book by its cover? How useful are bibliometric indices for the evaluation of "scientific quality" or "scientific productivity"?
Abstract
How to pre-select the most promising candidates for an open position out of several applications? One of the possibilities is to check the personal bibliometric indices of these candidates by looking into appropriate databases. In these databases the number of publications, the total number of citations, the average number of citations per paper and the h-index are easy to find. Thus, it is easy to use these parameters for a pre-election. First, the particular values for the several bibliometric indicators could be retrieved for scientists working in the field of Anatomy & Cell Biology. Next, an analysis of how useful and reliable these bibliometric indicators are is performed. Most of the indicators strongly depend on the seniority of a researcher. Thus, these indicators favour older scientists over younger ones. Based on that, these indicators are not well-suited to identify young and promising scientists. Therefore, it is proposed that indicators, which correct for the time a scientists spends working in the field, may be better suited for such a pre-election, such as the hy index (also known as m-index) or the Py index. In this context, it should be emphasized that these indicators may be useful for pre-selection. All available indicators are based on data obtained from the past achievements of the scientists and may not predict their future achievements. However, despite the availability of these indicators, the best method to gain an impression of the quality is currently still the old-fashioned method of reading the papers.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Impact factor and other indices to assess science, scientists and scientific journals.Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2010 Jul-Sep;54(3):197-212. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2010. PMID: 21409860
-
[The impact factor: a factor of impact or the impact of a (sole) factor? The limits of a bibliometric indicator as a candidate for an instrument to evaluate scientific production].Ann Ital Med Int. 1999 Apr-Jun;14(2):130-3; discussion 134-5. Ann Ital Med Int. 1999. PMID: 10399377 Review. Italian.
-
[New bibliometric indicators. Is this the end of the impact factor era?].Magy Onkol. 2009 Jun;53(2):115-25. doi: 10.1556/MOnkol.53.2009.2.3. Magy Onkol. 2009. PMID: 19581177 Hungarian.
-
[Breast pathology: evaluation of the Portuguese scientific activity based on bibliometric indicators].Acta Med Port. 2006 May-Jun;19(3):225-34. Epub 2006 Sep 7. Acta Med Port. 2006. PMID: 17234084 Review. Portuguese.
-
[Approximation to the impact of biomedical journals in neurological sciences: study of bibliometric indicators in the Journal Citation Reports-Science Citation Index 2006].Rev Neurol. 2009 Feb 1-15;48(3):117-28. Rev Neurol. 2009. PMID: 19206058 Spanish.
Cited by
-
Global publication productivity and research trends on recurrent ovarian cancer: a bibliometric study.Front Oncol. 2024 Jul 5;14:1422213. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1422213. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39035742 Free PMC article.
-
A scientometric analysis of research trends on emerging contaminants in the field of cancer in 2012-2021.Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 25;10:1034585. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1034585. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36504950 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Global trends in research related to emergence delirium, 2012-2021: A bibliometric analysis.Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 8;14:1098020. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1098020. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 36968713 Free PMC article.
-
Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics.Ir J Med Sci. 2019 Aug;188(3):939-951. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1936-5. Epub 2018 Dec 3. Ir J Med Sci. 2019. PMID: 30511320 Review.
-
A scientometric analysis of research trends on targeting mTOR in breast cancer from 2012 to 2022.Front Oncol. 2023 Aug 10;13:1167154. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1167154. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37637052 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous