Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr 5;6(4):e18571.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018571.

Body size, physical activity and risk of colorectal cancer with or without the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP)

Laura A E Hughes  1 , Colinda C J M Simons, Piet A van den Brandt, R Alexandra Goldbohm, Anton F de Goeij, Adriaan P de Bruïne, Manon van Engeland, Matty P Weijenberg
Affiliations

Body size, physical activity and risk of colorectal cancer with or without the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP)

Laura A E Hughes et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: We investigated how body size and physical activity influence the risk of the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methods: In the Netherlands Cohort Study (n = 120,852), risk factors were self-reported at baseline in 1986. After 7.3 years of follow-up, 603 cases and 4,631 sub-cohort members were available. CIMP status according to the Weisenberger markers was determined using methylation specific PCR on DNA from paraffin embedded tumor tissue. Hazard rate ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals for CIMP (27.7%) and non-CIMP (72.3%) tumors were calculated according to BMI, BMI at age 20, BMI change, trouser/skirt size, height, and physical activity.

Results: BMI modeled per 5 kg/m(2) increase was associated with both CIMP and non-CIMP tumors, however, HRs were attenuated when additionally adjusted for trouser/skirt size. Trouser/skirt size, per 2 size increase, was associated with both tumor subtypes, even after adjustment for BMI (CIMP HR: 1.20, 95%CI: 1.01-1.43; non-CIMP HR: 1.14, 95%CI: 1.04-1.28). Height per 5 cm was associated with both tumor sub-types, but HRs were attenuated when adjusted for body weight. BMI at age 20 was positively associated with increased risk of CIMP tumors and the association was significantly less pronounced for non-CIMP tumors (P-heterogeneity = 0.01). Physical activity was inversely associated with both subtypes, but a dose-response association was observed only for non-CIMP tumors (P-trend = 0.02).

Conclusions: Body size, especially central adiposity, may increase the risk of both CIMP and non-CIMP tumors. Body fat at young age may differentially influence risk. Physical activity appears to decrease the risk of CRC regardless of these molecular subtypes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Washington DC: AIRC; 2007. 2007. Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer: a Global Perspective.
    1. Derks S, Postma C, Carvalho B, van den Bosch SM, Moerkerk PT, et al. Integrated analysis of chromosomal, microsatellite and epigenetic instability in colorectal cancer identifies specific associations between promoter methylation of pivotal tumour suppressor and DNA repair genes and specific chromosomal alterations. Carcinogenesis. 2008;29:434–439. - PubMed
    1. Issa JP. CpG island methylator phenotype in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:988–993. - PubMed
    1. Sieber OM, Heinimann K, Tomlinson IP. Genomic instability–the engine of tumorigenesis? Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:701–708. - PubMed
    1. Wong JJ, Hawkins NJ, Ward RL. Colorectal cancer: a model for epigenetic tumorigenesis. Gut. 2007;56:140–148. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types