Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Jun;21(3):342-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2011.03.002. Epub 2011 Mar 23.

DNA shape, genetic codes, and evolution

Stephen C J Parker  1 , Thomas D Tullius
Affiliations
Review

DNA shape, genetic codes, and evolution

Stephen C J Parker et al. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

Although the three-letter genetic code that maps nucleotide sequence to protein sequence is well known, there must exist other codes that are embedded in the human genome. Recent work points to sequence-dependent variation in DNA shape as one mechanism by which regulatory and other information could be encoded in DNA. Recent advances include the discovery of shape-dependent recognition of DNA that depends on minor groove width and electrostatics, the existence of overlapping codes in protein-coding regions of the genome, and evolutionary selection for compensatory changes in nucleotide composition that facilitate nucleosome occupancy. It is becoming clear that DNA shape is important to biological function, and therefore will be subject to evolutionary constraint.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Different genomic codes are subject to selective pressures. Shown is a hypothetical genomic region (top) with a gene (black rectangle), nucleosomes (red ellipses), and various transcription factors (colored circles). Gray rectangles (middle) represent genomic regions in which the primary order of the DNA nucleotide sequence encodes functional information. Pink rectangles (bottom) represent regions where genomic information is encoded in DNA shape. These various encodings can be dispersed, overlapping, redundant, and, importantly, can represent different types of biological function. Considering the molecular structure of DNA in addition to the primary nucleotide sequence can help in understanding how biological function is encoded in genomes. Note that symbols and spacing are not drawn to scale.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Three-dimensional structure of the DNA minor groove. The minor groove of a B-form DNA molecule (PDB code: 355D) is shown in this Chimera rendering. The backbone is represented as a ribbon and the bases as a ladder. The numbering system corresponds to nucleotides that are either complementary (i and i’), or offset by different numbers of nucleotides across the strands, in the 3′ direction. The red arrows point toward the 3′ end of each strand. Distances between C5′ atoms on each strand are depicted with yellow lines. Note that the C5′ atoms closest to each other across the two DNA strands belong to nucleotides offset by +3 and +4. (This figure was adapted from Jason A Greenbaum, PhD thesis, Boston University, 2006, and used with permission.)
Figure 3
Figure 3
The relationship between sequence identity and similarity in structural profile in a pairwise comparison of all 7-mer DNA oligonucleotide duplexes. DNA structural profiles were predicted using the ORChID database [21], and similarity in structure was measured using Euclidean distance. The color scale represents log10(counts) for each cell within the matrix, representing the number of sequences having a particular nucleotide sequence identity and a particular structural similarity. The cell in the lower left corner, which corresponds to sequences with 0% identity but very similar structural profiles, contains 1,365 distinct 7-mer pairs. The overall correlation (Pearson’s r) between sequence identity and structural profile change is −0.365.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. King MC, Wilson AC. Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees. Science. 1975;188:107–116. - PubMed
    1. Dobzhansky T. Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. American Biol Teacher. 1973;35:125–129.

    1. Parker SCJ, Hansen L, Abaan HO, Tullius TD, Margulies EH. Local DNA topography correlates with functional noncoding regions of the human genome. Science. 2009;324:389–392. ••This paper introduced a new method for assessing evolutionary constraint based on DNA shape, and showed that more than 10% of the human genome is under selection for structure. Of particular significance is the finding that a high proportion of functional genomic elements occur in regions that are under structural constraint.

    1. ENCODE Project Consortium Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature. 2007;447:799–816. - PMC - PubMed

    1. Itzkovitz S, Hodis E, Segal E. Overlapping codes within protein-coding sequences. Genome Res. 2010;20:1582–1589. •• This study presents a clever method to measure information content in coding sequences. The authors found that across diverse phyla coding sequences encode information beyond the standard genetic code.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources