Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Jul;19(7):871-81.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1119-7. Epub 2011 Mar 4.

Evidence for interventions to improve psychological outcomes in people with head and neck cancer: a systematic review of the literature

T Luckett  1 , B Britton, K Clover, N M Rankin
Affiliations
Review

Evidence for interventions to improve psychological outcomes in people with head and neck cancer: a systematic review of the literature

T Luckett et al. Support Care Cancer. 2011 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: In addition to cancer-related distress, people with head and neck cancer (HNC) endure facial disfigurement and difficulties with eating and communication. High rates of alcohol use and socio-economic disadvantage raise concerns that patients with HNC may be less likely than others to participate in and adhere to psychological interventions. This article aims to inform future practice and research by reviewing the evidence in support of psychological interventions for this patient group.

Methods: We searched CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL in December 2009. Relevant studies were rated for internal and external validity against the criteria of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) US Preventive Services Task Force. Wherever possible, outcomes were evaluated using effect sizes to confirm statistically significant results and enable comparison between studies. Meta-analysis was planned according to criteria in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. Levels of evidence for each intervention type were evaluated using AHRQ criteria.

Results: Nine studies met inclusion criteria. One study was rated 'good' for internal validity and four for external validity. Psycho-education and/or cognitive-behavioural therapy were evaluated by seven studies, and communication skills training and a support group by one study each. Significant heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. Based on a study-by-study review, there was most support for psycho-education, with three out of five studies finding at least some effect.

Conclusions: Research to date suggests it is feasible to recruit people with HNC to psychological interventions and to evaluate their progress through repeated-outcome measures. Evidence for interventions is limited by the small number of studies, methodological problems, and poor comparability. Future interventions should target HNC patients who screen positive for clinical distress and be integrated into standard care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2004 May;13(2):119-26 - PubMed
    1. Ann Behav Med. 2006 Jun;31(3):261-70 - PubMed
    1. Psychooncology. 2004 Apr;13(4):269-80 - PubMed
    1. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1986 Dec;54(6):802-8 - PubMed
    1. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Apr;120(4):507-16 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources