Postoperative complications in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix
- PMID: 21228744
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31820cf233
Postoperative complications in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix
Abstract
Background: Acellular dermal matrix has become a common adjunct in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction. The authors' aim was to determine whether acellular dermal matrix use in immediate prosthesis-based breast reconstruction is associated with higher rate of complications.
Methods: Over a 5½-year period at the Brigham and Women's Hospital, 470 postmastectomy defects were reconstructed immediately using tissue expanders or implants. These were divided into two groups: reconstructions with or without acellular dermal matrix. Data were collected on patient comorbidities, radiation, intraoperative tumescent solution use, prosthesis size, initial fill volume, and complications.
Results: The risk for major infections that required prosthesis removal was elevated in the acellular dermal matrix group (4.9 versus 2.5 percent), but this increase did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.172). There was a statistically significant increase in overall wound infection rate in the acellular dermal matrix group (6.8 versus 2.5 percent, p = 0.031), but in a multivariate analysis, the use of acellular dermal matrix did not materialize as a significant risk factor for overall wound infection. Overall surgical complication rate was significantly higher in the acellular dermal matrix group at 19.5 percent, compared with the non-acellular dermal matrix group at 12.3 percent (p < 0.001). Other significant risk factors for overall surgical complication included smoking, higher body mass index, higher initial volume, and larger implant size.
Conclusions: Patient selection for prosthesis reconstruction involving acellular dermal matrix should be judicious, especially among smokers and patients with elevated body mass index. Even though the use of acellular dermal matrix allows higher initial volumes and reduced number of expansions, one should be careful about putting in too high of an initial volume.
Comment in
-
An easy method of acellular dermal matrix fixation to the submammary fold in prosthetic breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jan;129(1):170e-171e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182362dfe. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012. PMID: 22186542 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Feb;125(2):429-436. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c82d90. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010. PMID: 20124828
-
Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Nov;128(5):403e-410e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822b6637. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011. PMID: 22030500
-
The use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 May;129(5):1049-1058. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824a2acb. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012. PMID: 22544088
-
Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction: a systematic and critical review of efficacy and associated morbidity.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Dec;128(6):1162-1169. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318230c29e. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011. PMID: 22094735 Review.
-
A comparison of acellular dermal matrix to autologous dermal flaps in single-stage, implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 May;131(5):953-961. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182865a24. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013. PMID: 23629077 Review.
Cited by
-
Acellular dermal matrices: Use in reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery.Can J Plast Surg. 2012 Summer;20(2):75-89. doi: 10.1177/229255031202000201. Can J Plast Surg. 2012. PMID: 23730154 Free PMC article.
-
DermACELL Acellular Dermal Matrix in Oncologic Breast Reconstruction: A Cohort Study and Systematic Review.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Jun 20;10(6):e4396. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004396. eCollection 2022 Jun. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022. PMID: 35747252 Free PMC article.
-
Biplanar Technique for Breast Implant Replacement through Mastectomy Scar.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Apr 24;8(4):e2702. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002702. eCollection 2020 Apr. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020. PMID: 32440399 Free PMC article.
-
Aseptic versus Sterile Acellular Dermal Matrices in Breast Reconstruction: An Updated Review.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Jul 22;4(7):e823. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000819. eCollection 2016 Jul. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016. PMID: 27536502 Free PMC article.
-
Veritas® bovine pericardium for immediate breast reconstruction: a xenograft alternative to acellular dermal matrix products.Eur J Plast Surg. 2012 Oct;35(10):717-722. doi: 10.1007/s00238-012-0736-9. Epub 2012 Jun 17. Eur J Plast Surg. 2012. PMID: 23002328 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Zienowicz RJ, Karacaoglu E. Implant-based breast reconstruction with allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:373–381.
-
- Namnoum JD. Expander/implant reconstruction with AlloDerm: Recent experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:387–394.
-
- Slavin SA, Colen SR. Sixty consecutive breast reconstructions with the inflatable expander: A critical appraisal. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86:910–919.
-
- Breuing KH, Warren SM. Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55:232–239.
-
- Spear SL, Parikh PM, Reisin E, et al. Acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008;32:418–425.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical