Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Feb;21(1):31-54.
doi: 10.1177/0962280210386207. Epub 2010 Oct 28.

Diagnosing and responding to violations in the positivity assumption

Maya L Petersen  1 , Kristin E Porter, Susan Gruber, Yue Wang, Mark J van der Laan
Affiliations

Diagnosing and responding to violations in the positivity assumption

Maya L Petersen et al. Stat Methods Med Res. 2012 Feb.

Abstract

The assumption of positivity or experimental treatment assignment requires that observed treatment levels vary within confounder strata. This article discusses the positivity assumption in the context of assessing model and parameter-specific identifiability of causal effects. Positivity violations occur when certain subgroups in a sample rarely or never receive some treatments of interest. The resulting sparsity in the data may increase bias with or without an increase in variance and can threaten valid inference. The parametric bootstrap is presented as a tool to assess the severity of such threats and its utility as a diagnostic is explored using simulated and real data. Several approaches for improving the identifiability of parameters in the presence of positivity violations are reviewed. Potential responses to data sparsity include restriction of the covariate adjustment set, use of an alternative projection function to define the target parameter within a marginal structural working model, restriction of the sample, and modification of the target intervention. All of these approaches can be understood as trading off proximity to the initial target of inference for identifiability; we advocate approaching this tradeoff systematically.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Cochran WG. Analysis of covariance: its nature and uses. Biometrics. 1957;13:261–281.
    1. Robins JM. A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with sustained exposure periods – application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect. Math Model. 1986;7:1393–1512.
    1. Robins JM. Addendum to: A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period–application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect. Math. Model. 1986;7(9–12):1393–1512. (MR 87m:92078. Comput. Math. Appl. 1987 14(9–12): 923–945.
    1. Robins JM. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association: Section on Bayesian Statistical Science. Alexandria, VA: 1999. Robust estimation in sequentially ignorable missing data and causal inference models; pp. 6–10.
    1. Wang Y, Petersen M, Bangsberg D, van der Laan MJ. Technical Report 211, Division of Biostatistics. Berkeley: University of California; 2006. Diagnosing bias in the inverse probability of treatment weighted estimator resulting from violation of experimental treatment assignment.